Opinions on a distributor stamping
 

Does this look like a re-stamp?
It looks like the diameter is original.

I'm not an expert, but I don't like it for a few reasons. I have the diameter from my 1111498 if you want me to compare it.

https://farm1.staticflickr.com/469/3...a74edb56_z.jpg

Looks good known date too

It looks like it is etched and not stamped.

I was trying to compare it to a known good one here. It looks kind of etched too, but I guess some look this way. Maybe when they get some age and then are cleaned?

Why is the 1 different on the 019 on the first one as compared to the one on BCreekDaves 019 stamp

Good catch. It is the same as the 1 in the date code.

Heres one with the same raised 0 after the 2 ...first 3 digits are unlike either here.

Safe statement to make that the "1" style could float from the date to the part number in any of the locations in the part number?

I have had several real 1111437s with the first three 1s with a tail and base.... Im guessing if the restamper had 3 1s ,hed have a 4th without going to a different font since all valuable distributors need 3 to 5 1s.......