The New, Newer Project: Part Tres... - Page 35

**njsteve** · #**341** 12-09-2016, 10:44 AM

It's an amazingly difficult job they have to do. I don't envy them their task. So an "appeals" process is a quite logical method of addressing anomalistic parts/conditions.

These cars were so haphazardly built as Pontiac tried to get them out the door with the both the EPA and Pontiac brass trying to kill the project the entire time due to the political correctness of the new fuel economy era. As for the starters - even the guys in the Super Duty section over at the Performance Years site who have these cars had no idea about this bizarre dated starter anomaly until we all started crawling under our cars and comparing notes. They were just as amazed as I was.

**Tracker1** · #**342** 12-10-2016, 12:33 AM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: njsteve</div><div class="ubbcode-body">It's an amazingly difficult job they have to do. I don't envy them their task. So an "appeals" process is a quite logical method of addressing anomalistic parts/conditions.

These cars were so haphazardly built as Pontiac tried to get them out the door with the both the EPA and Pontiac brass trying to kill the project the entire time due to the political correctness of the new fuel economy era. As for the starters - even the guys in the Super Duty section over at the Performance Years site who have these cars had no idea about this bizarre dated starter anomaly until we all started crawling under our cars and comparing notes. They were just as amazed as I was. </div></div>

Pretty important bit of info - hope Rocky Rotella has time to incorporate it into his 1970-81 book, giving you a credit. I love that red car from Maine, so much lust

cook_dw · #**343** 12-12-2016, 02:36 PM

Not sure how I missed this thread but love the original owners got to see the car and enjoy the MCACN. Cant beat that type of reunion.. Very cool...

**njsteve** · #**344** 12-12-2016, 09:50 PM

Glad you stopped by!

Yes, the reunion of Enrico and Lenora with their baby was the real reason I brought it out to MCACN. You can't put a price on something like that. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]

This was a photo of the moment when Lenora first saw the car: she stopped in her tracks and started getting all teary eyed. Rick was looking at me wondering why his wife stopped and then he turned his head and his jaw dropped. He then told Lenora to get moving so they could see the car up close.

**427TJ** · #**345** 12-13-2016, 08:19 PM

She was suddenly in her 20s again.

**njsteve** · #**346** 12-13-2016, 08:21 PM

They were the real Class of '66 - They were married in 1966. This was their 50th anniversary trip. Very cool!

**njsteve** · #**347** 12-13-2016, 08:22 PM

Found another survivor car with that crazy 1971 dated starter. Were are up to five now. This one is from the white/red T/A that a member here recently purchased.

**njsteve** · #**348** 12-13-2016, 09:23 PM

Today's 1108436 1B11 Starter Update:

White/red T/A: 137XXX (mid June ship)
FrankG's auto: 139XXX (late June ship)
Flamed 4-speed: 141XXX vin (unknown ship date - I don't have the PHS)
My SD auto: 142XXX vin (mid July ship)
1,700 mile auto: 144XXX vin (late July ship)

So far, this time span/VIN span covers the majority of the shipping time frames of the 1973 SD455. Quite interesting indeed.

67 442 · #**349** 12-13-2016, 10:05 PM

How many points are the judges going to give back?

**njsteve** · #**350** 12-13-2016, 10:31 PM

Currently waiting on the verdict - it goes through a review process that takes a while. They deducted all the points (16.7) as if I had a generic aftermarket starter and gave me a zero on that component.