Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2012, 12:49 AM
enio45 enio45 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 3,912
Thanks: 311
Thanked 277 Times in 169 Posts
Default Feedback on this 69Z

Can i have some feedback on this car - anyone know of it?

Do the dates and stamps and trim tag look good.

All info appreciated - buddy of mine is interested in the car.

69 frost green Z
__________________
Eddie M
MBTMF

68 COPO Camaro 9737 non-converted YENKO
69 YENKO SC Camaro, Hugger Orange - born with engine!
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 01-12-2012, 01:25 AM
jbsides jbsides is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Seal Beach, CA, USA
Posts: 293
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Feedback on this 69Z

Looks like a nice car, but a bit pricey, IMO. Sits a little saggy in the rear, and it appears to have been a non-cowl hood, non-spoiler car originally or they had been replaced at some point(also my opinion). And you have to wonder what happened to the original rocker covers. Plus there are some other repop parts here and there. Looks solid, but for that price? I guess if it is genuinely a 38K mile car it should draw that kind of cash.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2012, 01:32 AM
enio45 enio45 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 3,912
Thanks: 311
Thanked 277 Times in 169 Posts
Default Re: Feedback on this 69Z

i notice the brake valve on the subframe is missing???

based on what we hear - he will adjust price accordingly.
__________________
Eddie M
MBTMF

68 COPO Camaro 9737 non-converted YENKO
69 YENKO SC Camaro, Hugger Orange - born with engine!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2012, 01:47 AM
Carleen's Avatar
Carleen Carleen is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 943
Thanks: 1,538
Thanked 695 Times in 230 Posts
Default Re: Feedback on this 69Z

From CRG

•For 1968, only cars with 12-bolt axles received the valve. The C60 air conditioning option no longer caused use of the valve (though C60 cars could get the valve due to a 12-bolt axle). The one known exception is that NOR Z28's stopped using the valve midway through the 68 model and didn't begin again until mid-model year 1969.
•For 69, the valve was generally used on 12-bolt axle applications, except for JL8 equipped cars (which had disc brakes in the rear and didn't need the valve). As noted above, the 69 NOR Z28's did not use it until mid-year, in the late January / early February timeframe. Other exceptions in 69 include: some SS's and LM1's have been observed without the valve, and the valve has been observed on some drum brake 10-bolt axle cars.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-12-2012, 04:50 AM
Lynn Lynn is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 6,959
Thanks: 32
Thanked 2,543 Times in 1,169 Posts
Default Re: Feedback on this 69Z

Is the pop for real?
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-12-2012, 05:32 AM
Schonyenko2 Schonyenko2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Donahue, Ia. USA
Posts: 2,997
Thanks: 93
Thanked 98 Times in 54 Posts
Default Re: Feedback on this 69Z

Pretty car. I does look to me like those are mig plug weld in the picture behind the lft tire, that weren't ground very flat.Seems that the rt qtr to tail pan gap middle down is a bit large. Not that it couldn't be factory, but those welds don't look quite right.
It it a pretty piece. I have one like it....in a lot of pieces.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-12-2012, 05:39 AM
enio45 enio45 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 3,912
Thanks: 311
Thanked 277 Times in 169 Posts
Default Re: Feedback on this 69Z

any views on the stamp of the mtr and vin. does the trim tag look real?
__________________
Eddie M
MBTMF

68 COPO Camaro 9737 non-converted YENKO
69 YENKO SC Camaro, Hugger Orange - born with engine!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-12-2012, 06:32 AM
m22mike's Avatar
m22mike m22mike is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West of CAK
Posts: 5,001
Thanks: 766
Thanked 828 Times in 398 Posts
Default Re: Feedback on this 69Z

Eddie
The picture of the pad is to poor, and has to much paint on it to make a call. The trim tag looks OK but may have been off the car at some time.
The asking price is too high for the quality of the resto I see in the photos.
Agree the spoiler and hood most likley added.
Still a nice car.

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-12-2012, 07:22 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Feedback on this 69Z

All in all a much better quality than the run of the mill e-bay cars. Agreed a better pic of the stamping is needed. Probably worth the money if you like it and want it badly enough.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-12-2012, 09:26 AM
Carleen's Avatar
Carleen Carleen is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 943
Thanks: 1,538
Thanked 695 Times in 230 Posts
Default Re: Feedback on this 69Z





rear shock is loose
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.