|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Go Bergy!!
We all appreciate your efforts and also can understand the continuous requests for more and more details on these cars. This is Camaro stuff so this doesn't keep me up at night but the 69 Chevelle list I almost have it memorized:-) Keep doing an awesome job!!! Ryan
__________________
1969 Beaumont 350 Auto White Sold 1969 Beaumont 307 Auto Green Sold 1969 Chevelle SS 396-L35 Auto Blue Sold 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass 'S' Sports Coupe W31 |
The Following User Says Thank You to Ryan1969Chevelle For This Useful Post: | ||
bergy (11-13-2017) |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
A lot of confusing rhetoric. Doesn't sound like it is confirmed to be a real COPO.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
NCRS shipping data for this car would be interesting to know.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
There are two topics being discussed, one is this particular Camaro and two, is the criteria for the registry.
Many of the "COPO" cars do not , have dealer (Inventory sheets noted ) or factory paperwork, original drivetrains and or concrete owner history. Trying to inentify and register these special cars is a nobel and worthy endeavor. So thanks Bergy, and all involved. Regarding the registry, I would suggest that if you do rely on info from any source, that you disclose the source. Parts can be made to look authentic and not discernible via restamping, paperwork and protectoplates can be exactly duplicated and patinaed, and anyone can be fooled, when fakers get involved....etc. Regarding this particular Camaro, I couldn't state either way based on info presented whether or not this is a COPO, but there is a lot of weight being placed on one hole in the firewall on a car which has not retained much if any originality over the years. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Regarding this particular Camaro, I couldn't state either way based on info presented whether or not this is a COPO, but there is a lot of weight being placed on one hole in the firewall on a car which has not retained much if any originality over the years.[/QUOTE]
But if the hole is not there? End of story.
__________________
"Knowledge is good" Emil Fabor 67 L/78 Camaro SS/RS H-H,1W,2LGSR,3SL,4K,5BY. (Sold) 70 L/78 Nova M-21,Black Cherry,Sandalwood Int. 09 Pontiac G8 GT Premium,Sport,Roof. Liquid Red. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I don't think it would be easy to separate the cars based on paperwork/original parts, etc. As already stated, who decides what is original? I think a great job is being done now and the only improvement would be to note the soureces of the docs, inspections, parts, etc. presented. And then let everyone do thier own research.
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
Great job by Bruce and all involved!
__________________
Bruce Choose Life-Donate! |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Here is the photo that caused uncertainty.
__________________
...... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
What uncertainty? I don't see the cowl wiring hole?
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
With the angle of that pic, if there is no grommet or wire. How could you tell if a hole is or is not actually their. I was not able to get any other pics. But what i can tell you, is that someone drove 17 hrs straight thru to get this car from texas. The price of the car was cheap enough, that if it is not a copo. He will get his money back if he sells.
__________________
67 Z28, 67 RS/SS 396 Canadian, 73 Camaro Z28/LT Carolina Blue |
|
|