|
|
|
#722
11-21-2015, 06:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: markinnaples</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That Camaro is beautiful, but with those size rear tires, that thing needs to sit up about 2" more in the rear. Really looks like it would hit the rear tires on the smallest bump. </div></div>
I concur. Gotta be inside the wheel well. My .02cents
__________________
Jersey Jeff 69 Day-2 L89 T400 BX 2015 ZL-1 Auto 98 Surburban 
|
|
#724
11-21-2015, 03:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
|
|
#725
11-21-2015, 08:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
rat tuned, that Chevelle is killing it.
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car John 10:30
|
|
#727
11-23-2015, 11:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Not sure how I missed this thread! Great pictures! Here is the stance I worked hard for. Quite low, but using stock 6320s and re-arched factory monos.
__________________
69 SS 350 convertible (in peices) 69 327 convertible (driver)
|
|
#728
11-28-2015, 06:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
My Dad's:
Circa 1968 -- Day 2 Stance 1967 Nove SS 327/275 4 spd 4.56 running on AR Ansen Sprint Wheels w/ slicks Help me find my Dad's custom cars! Visit: http://www.bydennislarsson.com  
|
|
#729
12-18-2015, 01:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
I know, I know....it's not "classic old muscle" like the first pic I posted of my '69 in this thread I started 570,000 views ago, BUT......today is today and "stance still matters". With the current Mopar and Mustangs prowling the streets, my new ZL1, IMO, just has that "badass stance". Merry Christmas to all you guyz!
__________________
Jersey Jeff 69 Day-2 L89 T400 BX 2015 ZL-1 Auto 98 Surburban
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
