PDA

View Full Version : 69 OPO


lwkitt427
05-19-2009, 04:20 PM
CAN ANY ONE TELL ME WHAT THEY KNOW ABOUT THE COPO ON EBAY NUMBER 290317970191 3RD TIME LISTED WOULD LIKE SOME INFO ON THE CAR PLEASE

PeteLeathersac
05-19-2009, 04:36 PM
Your eBay # is off incorrect but you're probably referring to this one...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1969-DOCU...A1%7C240%3A1308 (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1969-DOCUMENTED-SCUNCIO-COPO-CAMARO_W0QQitemZ290317970197QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUS_ Cars_Trucks?hash=item43984cab15&_trksid=p4506.c0.m 245&_trkparms=72%3A317%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A 1308)

It'd be interesting to know if the mentioned alum. heads were supplied loose or installed at original vehicle delivery?.

Probably best to contact one of these fellas for info on any Scuncio cars...

Ed James
401-315-2006
[email protected]

Bob Johnson
401-568-1745


http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif
~ Pete

--------------------
I like real cars best...the REAL real ones!

Chevy454
05-19-2009, 06:10 PM
I'm curious to know if they did a complete short-block change, or even pistons, when they put the 074s on...otherwise, there ain't near enough piston to fill those chambers! Great looking car, though...

PeteLeathersac
05-19-2009, 06:23 PM
VIN 124379N634907

Goggling the Vin shows the Vin is listed as one documents are available for also this old thread from '02..
http://www.yenko.net/ubb/Forum1/HTML/000827.html

Exactly on the heads Rob!.

http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif
~ Pete

Born30YrsLate
05-19-2009, 08:57 PM
I'm pretty sure the seller is a memeber here...I would have to do some digging to come up with this username...

x Baldwin Motion
05-19-2009, 09:08 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure the seller is a memeber here...I would have to do some digging to come up with this username...

[/ QUOTE ]

I would say it may be the same as his Ebay user name. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/hmmm.gif

Vern B
05-20-2009, 12:10 AM
This VIN is 641 from my 69 COPO.

69 Post Sedan
05-20-2009, 12:54 AM
When I picked bought my MN motor a year and a half ago, it had 842's on it dated 8/68. I wondered if they were dealer installed or put on at a later date. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif

This is what it looked like when I first brought it home.

http://i300.photobucket.com/albums/nn2/brkyard/COPO-1.jpg

markjohnson
05-20-2009, 02:04 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I'm curious to know if they did a complete short-block change, or even pistons, when they put the 074s on...otherwise, there ain't near enough piston to fill those chambers! Great looking car, though...

[/ QUOTE ] Rob, I gotta agree with you about not enough piston to fill those #074 chambers! I put a set of aluminum #077's on my stock 1970 LS-6 closed chamber motor and it really neutered it down. Sure it's more pump gas friendly and even runs a little cooler but it doesn't have the snap that it used to. I even used a very thin Cometic head gasket (.022, I think) to simulate the original thin steel embossed gasket. Lately, I've been thinking of a piston swap or maybe even putting back on the old #291 iron closed chambers.

Chevy454
05-20-2009, 04:27 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm curious to know if they did a complete short-block change, or even pistons, when they put the 074s on...otherwise, there ain't near enough piston to fill those chambers! Great looking car, though...

[/ QUOTE ] Rob, I gotta agree with you about not enough piston to fill those #074 chambers! I put a set of aluminum #077's on my stock 1970 LS-6 closed chamber motor and it really neutered it down. Sure it's more pump gas friendly and even runs a little cooler but it doesn't have the snap that it used to. I even used a very thin Cometic head gasket (.022, I think) to simulate the original thin steel embossed gasket. Lately, I've been thinking of a piston swap or maybe even putting back on the old #291 iron closed chambers.

[/ QUOTE ]
If my memory isn't failing me [quite possible!], you're talking about a 34cc dome [L72] going into a 118cc chamber [074]...just ballparking it, that combo would be somewhere in the 9:1 range! http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/eek.gif

And that's a best case scenario, assuming the rest of the clearances/specs are spot on...