Log in

View Full Version : 1962 Bubble top 409 hp 409 cu in


mprice
10-15-2009, 07:28 AM
1962 Bubble top 409/409 Black with red interior, restored approximately 10 years ago on a rust free arizona body. new interior, painted wheels and dog dish caps, posi rear correct air cleaner, factory tach, fan shroud idler etc. block casting jan 22 1962. new glass. runs good, drive it or show it. $49,800.00 call 217-620-3405

quick-bowtie
10-15-2009, 10:01 PM
Send me some pics to [email protected] Thanks Andy

1969z280
10-16-2009, 12:38 AM
Send us all some pictures. you can e-mail me at [email protected] Thanks, Ed

mprice
10-16-2009, 12:40 AM
Ok I will try to get them to you tonite. Thanks for the interest

mprice
10-16-2009, 04:15 AM
I have tried to send to your email address with no luck.

RUQUIK
10-16-2009, 05:21 AM
Please send pics to [email protected]

Thanks

Stefano
10-16-2009, 05:59 AM
[ QUOTE ]
1962 Bubble top 409/409 Black with red interior, restored approximately 10 years ago on a rust free arizona body. new interior, painted wheels and dog dish caps, posi rear correct air cleaner, factory tach, fan shroud idler etc. block casting jan 22 1962. new glass. runs good, drive it or show it. $49,800.00 call 217-620-3405

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it an original 409/409 or just a made up car?

mprice
10-16-2009, 06:31 AM
It was not orginally a 409 car. It is as 99.9% of them is it was restored this way. I am not trying to misrepresent it but something about "just a made up car" sounds bad.

markjohnson
10-16-2009, 06:44 AM
Stefano, just left your website and was curious if you have any paperwork at all to document your black Bel Air as an original 409 car? That sure looks like Bob Webster's old black car.

allcamaro
10-16-2009, 06:46 AM
http://www.fototime.com/1574538FD5A5CFC/standard.jpg

http://www.fototime.com/02B233606DD9165/standard.jpg

http://www.fototime.com/3FD0C5F848A7745/standard.jpg

http://www.fototime.com/D647F96938066C4/standard.jpg

http://www.fototime.com/9D8011F9603F4C2/standard.jpg

1969z280
10-16-2009, 11:22 PM
Mick:

There is an underscore "_" between the e and the l (as in e_lis). Here it is again [email protected]

Thanks,
Ed