PDA

View Full Version : R Code 1969 Mustang Mach 1

10-29-2013, 08:14 PM
Hi folks...

In my travels, I've found a very rusty R code 1969 Mustang Mach 1 body shell. It needs everything (full floors, quarters, rockers, etc.). The shell has been Redi-Stripped. It has plenty of paperwork to go with it. What is the shell worth? <<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/confused.gif

Thanks in advance guys!

Wayne
Fast67VelleN2O
10-29-2013, 08:42 PM
4 sp or auto? Drag pack? Colors?
BARRY
10-29-2013, 09:38 PM
5, will cost 60, 80 to restore
10-29-2013, 10:19 PM
Car was a four speed; Acapulco Blue, Black interior, shaker hood, window slats -- appears it was a pretty nice car when it was new. Honestly, I can't remember if it had the Drag Pack option.

Wayne
442w30
10-30-2013, 02:36 AM
CJ Mach Is are a dime a dozen. Not worth going into debt if you can spare.
markjohnson
10-30-2013, 03:17 AM
I agree. There does seem to be a lot of these cars out there.
10-30-2013, 03:46 PM
Thanks guys...That's kind of what I thought, and this thing is a real pooch.

Wayne
Fast67VelleN2O
10-30-2013, 03:51 PM
No matter how you look at it, its still an R code, shaker, fastback Mach 1 with great colors. If its a completely bare shell with no parts to go with it, you're looking between 4,000 and 8,000.
tom406
10-30-2013, 04:05 PM
I agree with Matt. Acapulco Blue on Black is a stunning combo for these cars. 1969 Z/28's are common as dirt in the realm of musclecars, but that hasn't seemed to hurt them too much value-wise. 1969 Mach 1 Mustangs are one of the iconic Musclecars and one of the few Fords to crossover with wide acceptance to the other brand supporters. Supply is relevant when compared to supply. As long as demand outstrips supply.....

But make no mistake, everything CJ specific to this car will cost the restorer dearly when the time comes to assemble.
tom406
10-30-2013, 07:09 PM
&quot;Supply is relevant compared to DEMAND&quot; is how above comment should have read...
twertsy
10-30-2013, 08:01 PM
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: tom406</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> &quot;Supply is relevant compared to DEMAND&quot; is how above comment should have read... </div></div>

Lol......thought maybe that was some new fangled revenue model I hadn't yet heard of.....