1967 Camaro 4K Convertable

[brent396]

http://bend.craigslist.org/ctd/5880858608.html

[1967 4K]

Very cool

[WILMASBOYL78]

Very neat....

Does the stance seem a little 'tall'?? looks like a lot of room between the tires and the fenders...maybe it is just the photo?? I like the 'up look'..

-wilma

[resto4u]

It says NOM, date coded correct drivetrain. Then says 1968 396/375 hp.engine, can't be date code correct to a 67 camaro.

[cook_dw]

Ahhh.. The good ole Caution Fan sticker.. Wish there were more pics of like the stampings and trim tag...

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: WILMASBOYL78</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Does the stance seem a little 'tall'?? looks like a lot of room between the tires and the fenders...maybe it is just the photo?? I like the 'up look'..

-wilma </div></div>

Seems to look right as far as stance.?. <<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif


https://images.craigslist.org/00707_Sp7aW6uChJ_1200x900.jpg

http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics/usergals/2016/11/full-1263-52317-1968.jpg

[427TJ]

No, that car is sitting high on new springs. Camaros did have a higher stance than Firebirds but not that high.

[Zedder]

Interesting...I've contacted them for more info and Jerry's report. Is that a weld running along the top of the trunk pan?

[Kurt S]

Invoice says 2.73 axle - yikes.
124679N251094 They were asking $80K and it's sold....

[Charley Lillard]

http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics/usergals/2016/12/full-23-53835-image3.jpg