#s 350/4-Speed '69 Camaro

[scuncio]

Factory stick cars are getting tougher to find in original condition...neat car, currently $10k with no reserve.

Factory D80 too....

1969 Camaro (http://ebay.to/2vcnvwZ)

http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/4zIAAOSwAYJZfP1F/s-l1600.jpg

[firstgenaddict]

There is something up with the VIN number shown in the ad...

N631633 is an April VIN with a October Trim Tag...

[all_about_cars]

Ya 10A trim tag, Trans has vin and January date and only other dates I see are head dated April.?

[scuncio]

Good catch, that is one heck of a good question.

[Lynn]

Clearly engine and trans are out of an April car. Funny, I have seen LA partials with two different sizes, but not Norwood. Notice the larger "N" on the trans stamp.

Also should be 19N631633, but is 79N631633. Could just be a mis stamp, but not original to this car. Oct. VIN would be 19N69xxx or later.



Still, not a bad car for the money... assuming it stays low. Someone (you guys that capture these things) needs to make sure we have good pics of that trim tag. It will show up next year in a "real deal" copo with "correct" big block heater core and power brakes and correct pierceing for a ducted hood. Wanna bet?

Hmm. Just saw it is listed as being vin 1243769N631633. Not possible on a 10A car. I am guessing the vin has been swapped, as that trim tag does not look to have been off the car. Carefully check the hidden partials on this one.

[cook_dw]

It will show up next year in a "real deal" copo with "correct" big block heater core and power brakes and correct pierceing for a ducted hood. Wanna bet?



First thing I thought too..

[scuncio]

Bid to $15k the first time, no sale, now $9500 with no reserve: Link to 1969 Camaro For Sale (http://ebay.to/2wVLiyT)

Pretty clean car underneath....

http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/6MEAAOSww5JZfQGZ/s-l1600.jpg

[Kurt S]

T0423HC and heads 3932441 D229.
But the car was finished either 4/21 or 4/22. So that block can't be original..... So close.