PDA

View Full Version : Interesting '73 Z/28 with Docs


scuncio
10-23-2018, 04:09 AM
Great docs on this one - but it looks like it started life with a white exterior and without the RS package.

At $23k, it seems like a fair deal for a restored car with the original drivetrain, but when the seller states "replacement of complete undercarriage" I wonder what it looks like up close (hopefully it was done correctly).

Link to 1973 Z/28 auction (https://ebay.to/2q5sxrp)

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/QDcAAOSwwBhboDsa/s-l1600.jpg

https://photos.smugmug.com/SYc-Site/i-WxvMRwH/1/16ae174b/X3/s-l1600-X3.jpg

66BoxNova
10-23-2018, 10:53 AM
Why on earth do so many people scuff/damage the cowl tags.

BCreekDave
10-23-2018, 11:03 AM
Why on earth do so many people scuff/damage the cowl tags.

Maybe cause sometimes there is so much paint and sealer on them they can't be read.

Mine had a big glob of body sealer on the 28.10 and it couldn't be read.

BCreekDave
10-23-2018, 11:05 AM
Whats a "certification tag" placed on the block? Certified for what?

McCune
10-23-2018, 12:53 PM
30K original miles and the original engine pulleys are missing. That is a 15K car tops.

Ricks72Z28
10-23-2018, 08:23 PM
That's one of the earliest 73 I have seen.

Jonesy
10-23-2018, 08:46 PM
Wouldnt that be late? Invoice says July 14, 1973 and the Build sheet looks like July 5th. Thats seems really late.

Tracker1
10-24-2018, 12:35 AM
Wouldnt that be late? Invoice says July 14, 1973 and the Build sheet looks like July 5th. Thats seems really late.

I've got a '76 Norwood Trans Am that's 07C

McCune
10-24-2018, 12:53 AM
Camaro production # is 85808, very late.

scuncio
10-24-2018, 01:59 AM
Sold for $23k.

66BoxNova
10-24-2018, 10:43 AM
Maybe cause sometimes there is so much paint and sealer on them they can't be read.

Mine had a big glob of body sealer on the 28.10 and it couldn't be read.

I get it, but maybe trying a paint remover or a stripper would cause less damage to the tag. Just my thoughts. Anyway it’s a nice car.

Ricks72Z28
10-24-2018, 05:47 PM
Yep, you guys are correct...what was I thinking...