'69 Hugger Orange #s RS/Z

[scuncio]

Looks like a good car that hasn't been fluffed to oblivion. I like the look of the trim tag and I'd like to see a picture of the engine stamp but it isn't included in the auction pics. Interior color change from black std to white houndstooth, sure, no problem. Have to say the trunk detailing is horrendous and I'd have to get that done within a day of taking delivery...but that's a small nitpick.

Link to 1969 RS/Z auction (https://ebay.to/2Rvsp4I)

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/vlMAAOSwhY9cPQZV/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/3bIAAOSwo1lcPQg-/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/BOEAAOSw6X1cPQf3/s-l1600.jpg

[PeteLeathersac]

'

Subject VIN 124379N624053
As this recent thread w/ engine stamping date same as block + head casting dates...
https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?p=1425017

:beers:
~ Pete

.

[BigD69]

Trans is a re-stamp along with the block.

[Late BrakeU2]

Hard to believe these are a half century old this year, the fakes not quite as old..

[Tracker1]

Trans is a re-stamp along with the block.

Agreed that's a bad engine stamp, and it's a November Muncie case ('S') in a March car - they tried to match the date code of the trim tag by stamping 03E into the case - LOL!

[mike1971]

Looked at it a month ago. Good driver but lots that aren’t correct. ��