'69 RS/Z Project - "Believed to be original block"

[scuncio]

I'm always skeptical when I see a picture of the loose trim tag. Desirable options on this one. Thoughts on the block stamp?

Link to 1969 RS/Z Project Car auction (https://ebay.to/2noDiHq)

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/~g4AAOSwhLddiqOo/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/Yc4AAOSwf0ZdiqO7/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/fEQAAOSwkdpdiqPp/s-l1600.jpg

[Jonesy]

Block stamping looks legit, whether its this cars original engine, that's another question.
Tag off does raise even more questions.

[PeteLeathersac]

'

Lots going for it but loose tag a shame if all genuine.
How's the 0115 Engine build jive w/ the 02D date NOR 26634 Body compared to other known examples?:hmmm:
:beers:
~ Pete

.

[Jonesy]

'

Lots going for it but loose tag a shame if all genuine.
How's the 0115 Engine build jive w/ the 02D date NOR 26634 Body compared to other known examples?:hmmm:
:beers:
~ Pete

.
From what I see, it doesnt jive. :)

[JRSully]

No reason to remove a trim tag unless.... And now everybody gets to enjoy the fake rivets you used to put it back on

[scott s]

That car was probally really rusty needing floos,quarters,etc and spent time sitting outside ,maybe the owner didnt want it stolen or???

[cook_dw]

As Jonesy stated. Block is legit would like to see the paint removed just for security. Also tag is legit but I'd wanna see hidden vins.

[Jonesy]

Sold?? for $18,899 to a 0 feedback bidder who appears to have been trying to bid the auction up.
I have a feeling this car will be back on the market again.

johalo76 was the seller.