'74 Z/28, #s 350/4-sp, Houndstooth Interior, 27,400mi

[scuncio]

Man...I wasn't aware this houndstooth pattern was even offered in '74. It's a bit much but I like it - the predecessor to the Pasha interiors in the late '70s Porsches, I guess? Asking $33k obo.

Link to 1974 Z/28 auction (https://ebay.to/2MuuhFu)

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/1xoAAOSw~Dpdn11j/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/5ggAAOSwlTFdn11b/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/hzAAAOSwaZddn11d/s-l1600.jpg

[azcamaros]

The repaint and the addition of the D88 stripes really hurt this car IMO. But still a factory air 4spd car is a good one to have. Judging from the stock exhaust and un-fluffed engine, the mileage is believable. It would look good next to my 73 Type LT Z28.

[Steve Shauger]

This car has been for sale multiple times. It was orig paint without incorrect striping. It was 25ish in prior craigslist ad. Definitely a low mileage and nice car.

[GM-26]

It's a Z28. You would think it would have a factory tach. I guess it was optional.

[Jonesy]

Yes the gauges were optional. Nice color combo. This is not a highly optioned car.
$33K is a reach, IMO.

[muscle_collector]

did houndstooth come standard on the "TYPE LT" option in 74-77??? my neighbor traded in a 67 or 68 big block camaro for a 75 or 76 TYPE LT and it had houndstooth.

[azcamaros]

did houndstooth come standard on the "TYPE LT" option in 74-77??? my neighbor traded in a 67 or 68 big block camaro for a 75 or 76 TYPE LT and it had houndstooth.
The large houndstooth in this car was only availible in the 73 & 74 sport coupe Camaro and was not available in the Type LT. This houndstooth was one of your standard choices for cloth interior is the standard sport coupe. I recently sold a 73 Z28 with this interior and found people either loved it or hated it.

[PeteLeathersac]

'

Just 302 miles + Stripe package added since this 2016 ad...maybe when the seller got it?:hmmm:
https://www.s2cars.com/chevrolet/camaro/15109988
1Q87T4N159963

:beers:
~ Pete

.

[PeteLeathersac]

'

:beers:

.

[mssl72]

Thanks for posting the build sheet pic Pete. I saw it in the auction. You don't see Norwood sheets that often. I've searched my Z a few times but have found nothing. As others have said it shouldn't have the stripes. It wasn't called out on the build sheet and if it did, it wouldn't have Z emblems on it. It is the first '74 Z I've seen with the houndstooth interior. The build sheet calls out "INT BLK&WHITE CLO".

[fortim]

For my education, what are boxes 95/96 on the build sheet referencing, "Decals and Hood"?

[PeteLeathersac]

'

Great question others here will know the answers to.
:beers:

.

[Steve Shauger]

For my education, what are boxes 95/96 on the build sheet referencing, "Decals and Hood"?

Note there is a - in box 96 (Decal) which designate not optioned/ available. For example box 86 (Tach) also has a - and that was not ordered.

[iluv69s]

worse thing on this car in my opinion is the used car dealer side molding... why would anyone put that on???

but I see some pics without it??

[L_e_e]

worse thing on this car in my opinion is the used car dealer side molding... why would anyone put that on???

but I see some pics without it??


I don't see any pics of the car for sale with side molding?

[PeteLeathersac]

'

It's Member azcamaro's '73 Z28 w/ the rub strip.
:beers:
~ Pete

.

[jerry455]

That interior would really go great with a white Z/28, black graphics with no vinyl roof.

[azcamaros]

worse thing on this car in my opinion is the used car dealer side molding... why would anyone put that on???

but I see some pics without it??

Sorry for confusing the topic with the addition of my 1973 Type LT Z28, I was comparing the subject car to mine.

Regarding the side molding, my car was ordered with the B84 Side Molding option and came from the factory that way. Although I don’t really like them, I will leave them on so I don’t disturb the original paint and originality of the car; I agree they are ugly.