837 stamp opinion

[Motorhead848]

curious what the opinion is on this 837. price seems to good to be true...

thanks

https://www.ebay.com/itm/1970-Chevelle-LS6-454-Camaro-Z28-Nova-L78-1100837-0-D-17-Alternator-GM/193508430525?epid=660001146&hash=item2d0e0052bd:g:YRcAAOSwMq5e4Dgc

[John Brown]

I'm not really fond of any Tennessee sellers after reading this thread.

https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=140881&page=4

Th HLA letters in the ebay user name line quite well with the seller/buyer mentioned. Use your own best judgement.

[parkbrau]

:hmmm: Is that supposed to be a D for the build month?

[ZLP955]

Avoid.

[m22mike]

No comment on the seller or the price, 0D17 is a known date for a 70 837. This is the only one I have saved.

[bergy]

not saying that it's the case here, but I've seen stampers make an original 834 into an 837.

[Motorhead848]

Thanks guys. Search continues...

[BCreekDave]

not saying that it's the case here, but I've seen stampers make an original 834 into an 837.

that 7 area looks kind of beat up to me.

[the427king]

NG

[ZLP955]

There is a good reason he now describes such items “as I received it”.

[JRSully]

I think the seller knows the 0D17 is a known 837 date, and that date (re)stamp looks the worst...

[BLACKLS5]

FWI, I sold that seller a couple of 834's a year or so ago. I'm pretty sure that's the stamper from Tenn. He's uses a couple of different Ebay names so be careful.