'69 RS/SS Camaro

[scuncio]

Interesting car claiming to be a #s L78. What do you folks think about the partial VIN?

Link to 1969 Camaro auction (https://ebay.to/3gGc9Y9)

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/UOEAAOSwZ0dgx2Lb/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/wnwAAOSw0fNgx2La/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/D4MAAOSwVrVgx2IS/s-l1600.jpg

https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/31EAAOSwvuRgx2JB/s-l1600.jpg

[X66 714]

I've never seen one that easy to read, especially after paint...Joe

[Jonesy]

I would have to agree on the partial. I dont like either stamping, pad or partial.

Front stripe is not correct either.:scholar:

[Jonesy]

124379n543170

Sold at Mecum Monterey in August 2019 for $61,050

[Sean]

Nah pretty confident it is a restamp. RUN

[X66 714]

Car is an 11c. Was Norwood stamping VIN in that location in that time frame?....Joe

[RSSSfan]

Nice car, but I wouldn't spend L78 money for it. That VIN stamp is weird - the picture almost makes it look like the numbers are raised. I had to look at it a couple of times.


Yeah, the stripe screwup is seriously messing with my OCD.

[RSSSfan]

Also, maybe push that driver's headlight door all the way closed before you take the picture! :rolleyes2:

[Astock]

6-8 tach? Looks much newer than speedo face.

[ssl78]

The partial vin should be on the deck in that time frame, also tach and gauge car with no clock

[sixt9rsx33]

Stamper for sure