1967/1968 Camaro Legends Manual

[Pacecar1969]

The Legends team is working on the 1967/1968 Judging manual and we are seeking help with photos. Specifically, we are looking for photo of the first design 1967 "telephone" quarter panel. Also, early design 1968 quarter panel without the astro vent. Plus photo of the early 1967 front bumper guards without the rubber insert. And photos of the 1967 and 1968 Walker jacks. Thanks for any help. This is what comes to mind at this stage

[1967Z28]

Here's the first design '67 quarter panel jamb. Just the phone indentation.

[Pacecar1969]

Thanks for the help. Brad

[X66 714]

Which jacks are known as Walker?....Joe

[1967Z28]

You're welcome, Brad.

[Pacecar1969]

Walker jacks were used on LA built cars. I think beginning later 1967. Definitely 1968 and 1969. Norwood had Universal jacks

[napa68]

I should have a 68 LA jack in a couple of weeks if you have not found anything by then

Tim

[X66 714]

Walker jacks were used on LA built cars. I think beginning later 1967. Definitely 1968 and 1969. Norwood had Universal jacks

My 68 Z/28 is LA. Square mast. What do you need pictures of?....Joe

[Chuck_Burg]

I have what I believe to be the original jack for my September '66 built 67 Camaro. I recently restored the jack when I restored the car... Let me know if you want pictures

[njsteve]

LOL, that image on the quarter panel is actually a Boomer Test.

No one born in the past 30 years would call that indentation shape, a telephone. :-) It's not a rectangle, nor does it have a flip up lid (for those born in the past 40 years.)

:tongue:

[TerryD]

Here is the jack data from our 68 LOS 04D:
Square, 8D on the mast.
Base - blank.
Load Rest - CAMARO 1968

I can e-mail photos if you'd like.

[firstgenaddict]

There is someone on CRG with a pair of NOS phone receiver 67 Conv quarters.

[cook_dw]

Granted not the original one to my 12D of 67 (68) LOS Z but it is correct for LOS cars as it came from one and has the correct date code. I also look forward to reviewing this Legends manual and would offer up reviewing the 68 section if you are wanting input but that is strictly up to you as I am sure you have several folks that are much more knowledgeable about them than I am but wanted to offer my input if its accepted.