1969 judge day 1 photos

[Jimlt4383]

Saw these pictures and thought yall would enjoy. Guy getting a new judge.

[dykstra]

Way cool pic!!

[Dave Rifkin]

So cool pictures. Is it just me or do the Judge decals took kind off?

[Mr70]

Very nice,1969 Illinois plates?

[60sStuff]

So cool pictures. Is it just me or do the Judge decals took kind off?

I’m with you, as I see many that aren’t level so to speak.

The RH decal is really off, whereas the LH looks much better.

[Bill Pritchard]

Very nice,1969 Illinois plates?

Definitely looks like them to me.

[R68GTO]

Likely a "pattern Judge" given the April date of the photo.

[PeteLeathersac]

Likely a "pattern Judge" given the April date of the photo.
‘
If so, does lack of a Hood Tach indicate it’s an M40 car?:hmmm:
Great pics, thanks for sharing them!
:beers:
~ Pete

.

[Jimlt4383]

Very nice,1969 Illinois plates?

Grobelny Pontac in Mattoon, IL.

[BJCHEV396]

Thanks for sharing the pics...way cool!

[lakercobra]

Very cool pic to see!

[muscle_collector]

‘
If so, does lack of a Hood Tach indicate it’s an M40 car?:hmmm:
Great pics, thanks for sharing them!
:beers:
~ Pete

.

ive never heard this before. ive owned plenty of automatic judges with hood tachs

[PeteLeathersac]

‘

Isn’t it, all Pattern Judge Stick cars had Hood Tachs but only some Autos…so if for sure a Pattern Judge but No Hood Tach, it must be an M40 car?:hmmm:
:beers:

.

[muscle_collector]

not that ive ever heard of. ive owned several of the pattern judges without hood tach

[Tracker1]

It seems like every time someone tries to pin down an 'absolute' option list for a pattern Judge (the first 1000 cars) an exception pops up. Yes, the "rule" is no hood tachs on M40 cars, but...you know what they say about rules. muscle collector also has the experience of owning multiples of just about every high-performance Pontiac ever made, so never say never I guess.