Log in

View Full Version : 2007 CAMARO (long)


Charles
01-04-2004, 04:18 PM
What others are saying about the new 2007 CAMARO
If you read between the lines there is some interesting stuff about the Corvette.
Work on a new 5th generation Camaro, though GM will tell you different, began about two years ago in almost a skunkworks fashion. It was a difficult task for GM to perform in secret especially during the acrimonious final year of the fourth generation Camaro. GM constantly referring to the Camaro being on “Hiatus” is a sure sign that they were not fully giving up on the Camaro. Initial work was largely marketing studies, seeing what potential Camaro buyer must have, would like to have, and defiantly don’t want. This kind of research is done before engineering and design on a new car program. Camaro is the 3rd most recognized name in GM’s portfolio, and it has understandably become notion at GM that it had to come back. The current team working on the new Camaro is pushing to build a car that will be appealing not only when it’s released, but 5-7 years later (as far out as 2015!). That means for the most part that retro is out, which is good for Bob Lutz, who dislikes such design to begin with. GM does not want another T-bird or new Beetle, as their sales do not hold up well over time. Initially in the development process, Cadillac’s Sigma platform was considered the leading architecture for which to base the new Camaro. Several issues however came up with this choice, the first one of which being the cost of the Cadillac platform which was not designed with Chevrolet prices in mind. Secondly, the Sigma platform has a very high cowl (commonly called firewall) height that was made as a concession for the Cadillac SRX Crossover. This however is not ideal for a low slung sports coupe and would be very expensive to impossible to correct. This realization occurred at about the same point GM discovered Holden. In importing the GTO, GM realized that Holden had expertise and efficiency in designing affordable rear wheel drive cars that they could only wish to have. When they signed a 3-year agreement with Holden to build the GTO, they also had an eye on the future, and an American made GTO. It seems Holden was already developing a successor to the V-chassis that the Monaro, GTO, and Commodore are all built on dubbed VE. The VE chassis (as Holden calls it) is sort of a hybrid Sigma/V-car design with most of the Sigma’s structure mated to V-Car suspension elements. This new design is being engineered to be fully compliant with US laws and will be built in one or two US factories beginning 2005-2006. It is Holden’s manufacturing system which allows for several cars to be built in one factory that is the cornerstone to GM’s plans. Currently they build 20 variants of the V-car in one factory down under. This setup GM hopes in the US will allow for a Buick to build say a $45,000 Lexus fighting sedan on the same line a $20,000 V6 Chevy Camaro. The US version of the VE chassis is currently being called Sigma-Lite or Sigma-Mass among those in the know, however GM has yet to give it an official name. The chassis debuted just this week as the Opel Insignia concept, proving how far it is along in development. The VE will also underpin the next GTO which will be made in the US in 2007. This new VE-based GTO is said to be lower, wider, and more aggressive than the current V-car based version according to those who have seen it. Expect the new GTO to be more identifiable as a GTO, while being a fully modern (non-retro) design. I believe the Insignia concept shows the low slung rounded look that will be the signature of this platform.

Now what does all this mean for the Camaro? Well since it was decided that the GTO would be redesigned and built stateside, Chevy has been in the game developing a coupe for themselves as a counterpart. Common notion was that this car would be a Chevelle, since it has historically been the GTO’s platform sibling. This speculation was recently fired by the fact that Chevy recently trademarked the Chevelle name again. In fact, for a few months there were questions in GM concerning what the new Chevy coupe would be called as some wanted it to be a Monte Carlo, some a Chevelle, and the majority wanted a Camaro. GMI has learned that the Chevelle rumors really never had any muscle behind them, especially after GM was roasted alive by GTO enthusiasts over the 2004 car, Chevrolet has become worried about getting the same reception over a reborn Chevelle. Cementing the name of the new Chevrolet coupe was ironically the Mustang concept at the 2004 NAIAS. Upon first site it gave Bob Lutz a case of the “I wants”, and pretty much cemented that any coupe that comes from Chevrolet will be have to first be a Camaro.

Its also noteworthy that we’ve learned that the new Camaro will not be the same size as the GTO, as the highly flexible chassis allows for different proportions among car models. Think of it as a GTO on a diet with some dimensional excesses removed. Our sources assure us that no one will mistake a Camaro for a GTO both in size or appearance. This new 5th Gen Camaro is currently on a timeline for a 2007 model year introduction, provided that no unexpected obstacles fall in it’s path. GM’s maze of new model concept approvals is staggering, and the new car does not have the final stamp quite yet. However it should be noted that at this point neither does the 2007 GTO, and that this is normal in the approval process for vehicles this far out. This final approval by GM’s Product Planning Board does not occur until the car is within about two years of going into production. In short, if the 2007 GTO becomes reality (which we all know will happen), then a 2007 Camaro almost certainly will to.

GM was quite proud of the fact that the Camaro was the fastest pony car during it’s final years and is willing to grow to great lengths to ensure it picks up where it left off. GM can match the Ford Mustang step for step horsepower wise with it’s superior powertrain unit. GM’s engines are cheaper and make more HP/Dollar than their respective Ford units despite the false generally held notion they are low tech. Power will likely come in three flavors, base V6, medium V8, and high end V8. The base V6 will likely be a high-value 3.5L (200HP) or 3.9L (230HP) engine. Expect GM to match the Mustang in V6 performance, but not exceed it. It is important that GM save costs on the V6 Camaro as it will likely be among the cheapest cars built on the whole Sigma-Lite platform. Though V6 buyers care about performance, cost and value seem to take more precedence in this segment. As much as people would like a 3.6L 255 HP high feature V6, it’s not likely due to its much increased cost. They do however, plan to offer a bolt on version of the supercharger used on the 285HP 3.5L that will show up in the 2005 Pontiac G6 to the general public through dealers. Contrary to some rumors, a 4-cylnder is not in the plans as it does not fit the image Chevrolet wants for the new Camaro. For a mid-level V8 expect either a 320 HP 5.3L or a 340HP detuned version of the Corvette’s 6.0L LS2 base engine. The 5.3L is the less likely of the above mentioned engines to get the nod because we are unaware of any plans to certify it for car use, a road the 6.0L is well down. For all intents the 5.7L is dead as the new Corvette will use a 6.0L engine in it’s place. This mid-model is likely to car the Z28 designation which will upset some Z28 enthusiasts, but follows the line with the Camaro’s recent history The top level V8 likely to again be called SS will also most likely be the 6.0L LS2 directly from the base Corvette. This engine making probably 10-20 HP less than in Corvette trim will make in the area of 390HP. The decision to use the SS designation follows GM recent trend of using the designation of the top performing car for each model. The car will also probably have some kind of affiliation with GM Performance Division. It is well known that Holden is designing it’s new VE cars to use 6 speed automatic transmissions, making them an obvious choice for the SS 5th Gen Camaro. The 6-speed automatic is actually simpler and cheaper to manufacture than a 5 speed design. There are rumors that team Corvette badly wants a paddle-shift setup to come from this design, but is exploring all options. This new transmission will be made at GM’s Willow Run plant that currently makes the 4L80-E and 4T80E transmissions. Four or Five Speed Autos will be used in lesser models. There will also be a 6-speed manual offered for those who wish to shift on their own.
On the outside the new Camaro will be lower and more seductive than the current GTO. It will also feature styling elements from the SS Concept of this year. People familiar with the new car claim it has a chrome bar concurrent of newer Chevrolets, however that element is very much in limbo. Naturally, the interior will be fully modern keeping in line with the GM’s recent achievements. Interiors have been a hot topic on the auto scene the last few years, and GM understands that the Camaro needs to hit a homerun to succeed. Ergonomics will be inherently better that the 4th Gen cars simply due to the better design of the new chassis. Basic features debuting on cars such as the 2004 Malibu are sure to be considered for the new car, such as remote start, Displacement on Demand, and XM and MP3 Capable radios. It is actually cost effective for GM to include such features in the new car because they were already included in the overall architecture design which will be the structure for more expensive cars. The new car will also include ABS and a revised traction control system that will make the Camaro an all weather car. In reality anything is possible, because Sigma –Lite will be so widely used, pretty much all of GM’s parts bin of options will be engineered to work with it, making the cost to include them in a Camaro negligible, What all of this means is that the Camaro will receive levels of options and refinements that was never imaginable, because it rides on a platform designed to for cars that cost much more. Things such as roll up windows and manual locks will not even be considered because it is cheaper to just include the power options than do the engineering to include manual options. Higher end versions may include features such as On-Star that are highly profitable and compact enough to not hurt performance. If GM thinks that people will pay for it, GM will likely include it. This is great for buyers of the top level Camaro will get much more for their money than they did with the 4th Generation. Speaking of price, expect GM to price the Camaro similar to the 4th Generation Camaro, slightly more than a Mustang of comparable price.


If Ford decided to chase the Corvette with a 500HP Cobra, don’t expect a Camaro to chase it. GM feels that the Corvette will do a good enough job of disposing with the challenge. The price spread could likely run from about $20,000 to $37,000+ (In 2007 dollars) for a 400 HP fully-loaded Camaro. Considering in 2002 a base V6 Camaro started at $19,000, this is not much of a price increase. GM thinks it can sell a 110,000 units a year at this pricing through tapping such markets as past buyers, well off twenty and thirty something males, buyers put off by the retro Mustang, and in general anyone looking for amazing performance at a Chevrolet price. GM has committed itself to making the Camaro not only faster and better than the Mustang, but quite possibly on of the best performers in it’s price range.

Though this article is a representation of the current state of the new Camaro to the best of our knowledge, please remember the car is three years from hitting showrroms and some details may change. When the wraps come off the 2007 Camaro it will bring an end to what has been a classic struggle within GM to keep one of it’s classic nameplates viable in an ever changing market. Though there have been many people pushing for this new car within GM at various levels for the last 7 years, few on the outside will ever understand the hard work and struggle that went into bringing a new car to light. However, Rest assured however, the new car is one that will be worthy of the Camaro name, and more importantly, one that people will buy!

DjD
01-04-2004, 05:21 PM
Charles should have given credit to GM Insider News for the above article. The thing to remember is that GM Insider is not affiliated with GM in any way and the article is purly speculation on their part. If there is to be a '07 Camaro well be seeing and hearing from GM around the end of the '05 year or so.

A side note, I have it on good authority that Chip Foose of hotrod fame who was involved in the design of the Prowler and did his version of the new T-Bird that was much better than the production car has provided a full size clay model to Chevy's design folks at their request. If you saw the show on the T-Bird you may have caught the part where Titus eludes to the secret project that Chip has locked away...

If you read about the '05 Mustang in the current Hotrod Mag, Ford feels they have a seller in todays market based on the package not the retro styling. IMO I think Chevy can do it too and a touch of retro would be a bonus for those of us with 1 foot stuck in the 60's...

jg95z28
01-04-2004, 07:35 PM
It'll be back in late 2006 as a 2007 model. This has been discussed at length on camaroz28.com in the 5th generation/ future vehicle forum if anyone is interested.

DjD
01-04-2004, 08:10 PM
That's the speculation everywhere but there has been no proof from GM/Chevrolet. I don't frequent www.camaroz28.com (http://www.camaroz28.com) has someone from Chevrolet made a public anouncement there? If so, can you copy a link to it and paste it here please.

JTH74
01-04-2004, 09:22 PM
I hope their styling is a lot better than what they have put out there so far! I think that the teenage kids drawing of like a retro 69 style was awesome, its just ashame that GM would not take that design into consideration, but if they did that they would have to admit that the styling engineers/designers that they pay big bucks, that they SUCK!

mc25t190
01-04-2004, 10:34 PM
chevrolet is marketing by holding off the enthusiasts to the point our kids will enjoy them as well as us purist. marketing 101 , hold off to the point that anticipation and curiosity gets us all! if this is the case then it will be the 1st time they have marketed anything correctly in a long time, maybe since 1967 at the camaros inception.JMHO! then we may get a YENKO, HUH?

Seattle Sam
01-06-2004, 08:27 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Charles should have given credit to GM Insider News for the above article. The thing to remember is that GM Insider is not affiliated with GM in any way and the article is purly speculation on their part. If there is to be a '07 Camaro well be seeing and hearing from GM around the end of the '05 year or so.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dennis,
Do you have a link to this GMI article? I searched but could not find it...

Thanks,
-Sam

DjD
01-06-2004, 03:47 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Dennis,
Do you have a link to this GMI article? I searched but could not find it...

Thanks,
-Sam

[/ QUOTE ]

Sam - It origionally was right on their front page www.gminsidenews.com (http://www.gminsidenews.com) I scowered their site and can't find it now! Using www.google.com (http://www.google.com) and searching on the first few words "Work on a new 5th generation Camaro, though GM will tell you different" will give you links to their main page and other evidence it existed. It's getting plastered all over automotive forums. I don't know why they pulled it or have hidden it so well!! I think the full article is in the post here but if you want I can provide a copy I saved off...

jg95z28
01-06-2004, 08:38 PM
Your wish is my command... http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif

[ QUOTE ]
OK. Time to break some news here (since it's been a slow week).
First, I want to again reinterate GM's car approval process (in a crash course kind of way).

General Motors doesn't "approve" a new car till it's actually time to start the money flowing to produce the car. "Approving" a car at GM today has nothing to do with the planning, development, or even prototype testing of the car.

When a car goes up for approval (which can take a couple of days, or even longer), every single little item is gone over. This includes factory layout, number of employees needed & where they will come from, the cost breakdown of every single component in the car, where these pieces will come from (in house, private vendor, another division or department), and a whole host of other mind numbing items that you would never ever consider in your wildest nightmares. In short, when a car goes up for approval, every single bolt in both the car & the plant it's going to be made in is accounted for & priced, competitively bidded on, and justified by engineering that it's needed.

Also included it the presentation is market analysis, data from tests of the vehicle & it's parts, and info from it's styling clinics.

Approval for a particular car IS NOT a 1 or 2 or even a 3 man show. It goes before a board that includes a wide range of people who have various titles. Even if CEO Rick Wagoner wanted a particular car, he is powerless to make it happen unless it passes the General Motors Product Planning Board (which he & Bob Lutz are members of).

But cars do clear hurdles. GM can start a car today for 2008, and it will go through "stages" of approval. It can be approved to move from planning to testing parts on a mule (typically an existing car). It can be approved to move from a styling mock-up to a styling clinic. a basic prototype can be approved, then a more detailed prototype. Studies can be approved to find and design a plant layout to produce the car. Even a concept testing various themes can be approved (sometimes right around the same time final clinics are held). All this before the car is actually "approved".

Although the board can approve or disapprove a car, the board can also send a car back for more work. Perhaps it needs more work on design, or the costs of it's parts don't add up, or perhaps the board decides to put something on hold until a more suitable chassis comes on line for convienence or to save costs.

Certain vehicles are certain to pass the board as soon as all concerns are addressed, especially new versions of existing models known to have a strong market, strong support from key members of the board or heavy lobbying from dealers. At this level, it's diplomatic skills, along with a really phoneminal amount of homework, & an ability to counter any hostile arguement with facts & figures rather than emotion. The board's job is to poke holes in your case, quite simply.



J. D. Powers has a solid reputation within the auto industry. If there is any outside source that has information on future automotive models planned in the future, they are the ones that have it... if you want to share it, unless you know someone in J.D.Powers, or know someone or a business who can buy a copy, it cost's about $50 grand to get your own (it also includes about every bit of statistical information on the auto industry you could ever envision).

You've heard me many time say that to get good information, don't go to the big guys (Bob Lutz's leaks, notwithstanding). Creating a new vehicle isn't a solo act, it involves hundreds of people from the planners themselves, to the vendors & contractors, to the guys who actually put together the factory & the unions who will be working in them. This is all before the vehicle's "approved". This is a great pool to check info, weed out the bad, and find out which info has some meat to it.

The reason I'm saying this is that I've been getting quite a few bits of info since I wrote the "Future Vehicles" article for PHR all told in confidence. Most all of that info, I can't mention till it shows up somewhere else 1st.

Although I still won't go into details about certain things such as the actual chassis & suspension layout or how sigma-lite will be cheaper to manufacture than the CTS's sigma (it's actually pretty ingenious..... no, don't e-mail me asking how, that's someone else's baby), I can post here what J.D. Powers is predicting.

According to them , the Chevrolet Camaro will return in model year 2007, along side the new Pontiac GTO and the Buick Regal coupe.

Other news I think you will be intrested in, there will be yet another "Solstice" type car shown at this years NAIAS, likely to be from Saturn. There will also be at least 2 "Sigma-lite/Opel Insigna" based RWD cars shown there as well. I don't have explicit information as to which divisions these car will be under. I can take a guess (Chevy & Pontiac), but that's is just a guess.

In case you haven't heard, Solstice is going to be built at Wilmington Delaware (unless a problem comes up), and the Camaro/GTO/Regal will be produced in Oshawa, Ontario in Canada (again, unless a problem comes up).

BTW: these cars won't be 2 door versions of sedans the way the GTO/Monaro is.

Remember, you heard it here 1st. That means Motor Trend Magazine should be along any minute to read & take this information, publish it, and say they found it themselves.

PS: To the sources: Thanks!

[/ QUOTE ]
Link - OK. Time to break some news here (since it's been a slow week). (http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=192968)

You should also read this follow-up.
Recap on the 5th gen Camaro (http://web.camaross.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=206549)

Do I believe this man? Yes, because he's reliable and an industry insider.

But go ahead and continue to be skeptical. There won't be any "official" word from GM for several more months.

jg95z28
01-06-2004, 08:42 PM
Here's the link to the GMI article...
2007-The Camaro will be There! (http://www.gminsidenews.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=2294)

DjD
01-07-2004, 01:09 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Here's the link to the GMI article...
2007-The Camaro will be There! (http://www.gminsidenews.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=2294)

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks for providing the links... I'm not a skeptic, I'm not taking speculation as gospel though. The folks actually working for GM and in the know are all keeping it to themselves. All the info being passed around could be dead on but, is it? Until someone from the General comes forward with the way it is I'm not buying stock in anything published on a few web forums. I've read enough factual information from GM and it's direction for the future that I could see how much of what was stated came to be. Again not a skeptic, just waiting for GM...

Seattle Sam
01-07-2004, 01:14 AM
Thanks Jeff! http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif

Charley Lillard
01-07-2004, 01:27 AM
You Skeptic.......

jg95z28
01-07-2004, 10:26 PM
Well if you read the latest ramblings from the same guy today on that website, even he's beginning to sound like a skeptic. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/crazy.gif