Anyone Own an L72 Camaro with a VIN 124379N651349

[Mark_C]

Your MN coded L72 is on Ebay. It's not in the Yenko VIN listing so I have no idea who sold it, or where it is.

L72 COPO Engine Auction (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=33615&item=7928156 427&rd=1)

[JChlupsa]

VIN comes closest to some of those listed on Ed C's site of smaller L72 dealers.

[nuch_ss396]

A loose observation here:

The intake is a 1970 ( LS-6 ) intake I believe. No date on
the block is listed, so it could be a 454. I'll ask.

Steve

[YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY]

'70 blocks have a 3 letter suffix code starting with a 'C' for the cars and a 'T' for the trucks.

[Mr70]

If that's Oswego Illinois,I & a bunch on this site are within spitting range of it.

[resto4u]

Any thoughts on the engine pad? I see circular marks on the pad. Roger

[Allen]

If we're gonna be picky, that "8" looks upside down.

[68vet427]

by golly it does !!!!
do you think it's a restamp or operator error at factory ??
joe

[Mark_C]

I've got images of a T0317, and a T0319 built engines and the T031 look the same on all 3 stamps. At least Tonowanda wasn't using an I at that point in time for a 1.

[KNAPPY]

Should the vin# be 79N651349 instead of 19N651349? Maybe the seller read it wrong. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif

[Jeff H]

No, the engine VIN stamp would be 19N.

[Jeff H]

Does anybody think the '8' looks wrong in that stamping? I know it's upside down, but looking through some pictures of big block stampings the 8's look fatter with the same width on the top and bottom. That 8 looks like a completely different font from most stampings I've seen.

http://i20.ebayimg.com/01/i/02/a1/c4/c9_3.JPG

[olredalert]

--------I would also be concerned with the broach marks!...........Bill S