Log in

View Full Version : 1967 camaro


Kim_Howie
07-22-2005, 12:24 AM
Take a look at the 4k on this trim tag http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayIS...item=4561917530 (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&category=6161&item=456 1917530)

Mr. T
07-22-2005, 12:54 AM
I think both the 2LG and 4k codes look very suspicious, compared to the 3SL code, which IMO is authentic/original to the tag.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v647/mistermister1/67ca6.jpg

SS427
07-22-2005, 01:03 AM
Not to mention the pop rivets holding the tag on. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif

Kim_Howie
07-22-2005, 01:05 AM
The car is too early for a 396 isn't it ???

Salvatore
07-22-2005, 01:29 AM
Is that mold in the back seat?

Rick H
07-22-2005, 04:57 AM
[ QUOTE ]
The car is too early for a 396 isn't it ???

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually December 1966 was when the 396 became available. Seeing that it is a 1st week December car it just might be. I said might. The 4K looks strange to me as well.

What's up with that grill emblem? If that car is a BB 396 car then why have a SS 350 emblem? I got it, they forgot to remove the grill emblem when he swapped out the motor. Yeah, that's it. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif

Plus, what RPO is that space saver tire??

Rick H.

Steve Shauger
07-22-2005, 06:02 AM
This car is coded as an L78 (4K), and from my research this option was introduced sometime in March of 67. There is no way that this car is a true 12A built L78. The L35 was introduced prior to the L78 and 12A is too early for that.

Mr. T
07-22-2005, 06:51 AM
Taking another look at the trim tag, it looks like somebody put a L right over the 4, on the 2LG code.

SamLBInj
07-22-2005, 08:05 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Taking another look at the trim tag, it looks like somebody put a L right over the 4, on the 2LG code.

[/ QUOTE ]
Looks like the L is covering the M..automatic car... http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif

69RSZ
07-22-2005, 03:56 PM
I would walk away just because of the home depot pop rivits http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/haha.gif http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/haha.gif

Rick H
07-22-2005, 04:22 PM
[ QUOTE ]
This car is coded as an L78 (4K), and from my research this option was introduced sometime in March of 67. There is no way that this car is a true 12A built L78. The L35 was introduced prior to the L78 and 12A is too early for that.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree completely about the L78, I just couldn't remember the intro date for the 375hp. Sucks getting old.

The tag has been doctored up and looks very bad.

Rick H.