Check out this Vin vs Cowl Tag

[firstgenaddict]

Someone tell me if I am wrong about this but Vin series 634XXX is in line with quite a few COPO's but this car has a Non X code 10C Vin tag.
Kurt this is not correct is it?
Ebay 69 Camaro (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1969-Camaro-w-Crate-Engine-410-rear-wheel-hp_W0QQitemZ4591907248QQcategoryZ6161QQrdZ1QQcmdZV iewItem)

[Steve Shauger]

That VIN fits for a car built sometime in mid to late April, not Oct.

[firstgenaddict]

That's what I thought as well!

[ANDY M]

634xxx would be late April/early May build. Not all COPO cars were built with consecutive VINs. This was a small block car with a V8 that might have been built the same day as a COPO was, but the 10C in no way comes close to the VIN.
IMO, the trim tag did not come with this car. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif
However, a photo of the VIN would be helpful.
No way this was ever a COPO, and not represented as anything but a nice driver, which it looks like to me. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggthumpup.gif

[supercomp 8.90]

ive noticed that you should go by the cowl tag body #s rather than the vin #s when checking for a copo. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif

[RamAirDave]

I'm thinking maybe it was a typing slip up, and maybe its supposed to read 534xxx. That would put it in that time frame. Plus I dont see why it would be swapped for the tag thats on it (non X, and color change). Doesnt look to have been swapped to me.

dave

[Kurt S]

Tag doesn't line up with 9N534xxx either.
VIN or cowl tag is swapped.