PDA

View Full Version : 1970 L78 NOVA SS 396 4-SPEED DOCUMENTED


BigG
04-12-2007, 03:17 AM
1970 Nova SS 396 L78-Speed CANADIAN car Factory Build Sheet . ALL NUMBERS MATCHING. Dark Green on black interior Just completed Frame off Restoration to concour level. Gary [email protected] 561-445-0649 check website at www.moviestarmusclecars.com (http://www.moviestarmusclecars.com) $75000.00

Mr. Chevy
04-12-2007, 05:00 AM
Cool ride, big improvement over what it looked like before with that awful yellow paint and tacky looking engine bay!!

EZ Nova
04-26-2007, 08:32 AM
Gary, I would like to know how you can try to pass this car off as something it's NOT? I have know about this car since Jim bought it, must be close to 15 years ago. It didn't have the original motor in it then? Also the Mileage was WAY more than 31 K when he bought it. So now all of a sudden the car has LESS miles AND the original motor??? Sounds a little fishy to me? And to think that the Legendary Motor car trail was used to pick this car up from BRANTFORD. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/no.gif

SuperNovaSS
04-26-2007, 09:15 AM
I don't see the 30K miles statement. Don't know about the numbers matching part. Some now consider a restamp or date correct numbers matching. Splitting hairs if you ask me. Numbers matching should be born with engine, trans, rear etc. in my opinion.


Jason

EZ Nova
04-26-2007, 05:13 PM
It says miles here on eBay:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayIS...p;rd=1&rd=1 (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ih=015&sspagename=STRK%3AME WA%3AIT&viewitem=&item=250107525344&rd=1&rd=1)

Hylton
04-26-2007, 05:26 PM
Gary,

Please clarify. Does the car have it's "born with" engine?

lowmile
04-26-2007, 05:48 PM
It looks to be a nice quality driver restoration. There are a LOT of things that need to be addressed to make it the, and I quote from the Ebay add "This is the best example of any 70 Nova SS in existence period." http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/no.gif One guy on this board has about 3 BB Novas that will "eat this cars lunch." "" NONE FINER"" You open yourself up to some critiquing with that kind of claim. Good luck with your sale. m

1969L78Nova
04-26-2007, 05:51 PM
This car was at the RM auction in Toronto a couple of weeks ago. Based on what I saw of the mangled cowl tag and the rivets holding it, I doubt the cowl tag was "born with" the body. Highest bid was $68,000 CDN...Owner told me later he was looking for $85,000 CDN. I did notice it had the wrong fan blade and a few cosmetic issues. Owners did not want anyone to get too close to the car. As soon as it came off the auction block it was loaded on to a trailer back to Montreal.

JRSully
04-26-2007, 07:39 PM
This guy appears to have gotten caught red handed on a bunch of different levels. His real problems will come when and if he actually sells the car based on the BS information. I hope nobody gets taken and don't hold your breath on this guy responding anytime soon.!

Hylton
04-26-2007, 08:12 PM
This is one of the reasons why I would like to see Classifieds open to paid members only.

rubbinisracing
04-26-2007, 08:35 PM
Patience Please! Good explanations take a while to create!

My bet is with "JRSully", no response.

mrrepodude
04-27-2007, 12:04 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An inquiry to the N.Y.State Dep't of Motor Vehicles concerning "restamping engine blocks brought this response..............
.................................................. .........................................
The re-stamping of an engine block by the dealer, as you described in your Email to us, is an illegal act.

Specifically, New York State Penal Law section 170.65 states: Knowingly destroying, covering, defacing, altering, or otherwise changing the form or appearance of a vehicle identification number on any vehicle or COMPONENT PART--such as an engine--is defined as forgery of a vehicle identification number, a class E felony, punishable by no less than 1 1/2 to no more than 4 years imprisonment.
..................................................

BigG
04-27-2007, 01:27 AM
In Response too all these gracious comments, I am chimming too set the record straight.1 In ref to miles I at no time certify the miliage to be actual and did not advertise it as such as I have only owned this vehicule for a year and no idea as to prier usage.All I did was mark what was on the actual speedo and this being a restored car not a survivor I considered miliage unimportant.2 About the engine this is not the first time nor will it be the last that an actual engine has been recovered. Ref too the auction RM in Toronto the car was on display for two Full days where thousands of people were invited to view and inspect the car thoroughly, which many people did.Yes we left Saterday after the car rolled, as we had a long ride home . This was an auction and not car show.Let me be clear '' No disrespect too you Nova guy;s, and this is a sweet piece ,but it is really nothing in comparison too my collection of High end Mopars and Pontiacs.My name has always been good and have no blemishes in over ten years of collecting and dealing in million dollar cars. I don;t need to ruin my reputation to make an extra $5000.00 to doctor up a Nova.

kwhizz
04-27-2007, 01:41 AM
About the engine this is not the first time nor will it be the last that an actual engine has been recovered.
"Quote"

Please tell us the story behind finding the "Original" engine..........It always neat to hear these how these things happen..........

Ken

EZ Nova
04-27-2007, 01:53 AM
Gary, as the guy who started this mess for you, I would like a chance to reply. I know I have not seen this car since you bought it. I would like to point out that YOUR eBay add leads people to believe that this is a 31000 mile car, as it shows that there, and does not say anywhere that those might not be the correct or not? YOU printed the info such as "NONE FINER" and "BEST EXAMPLE OF ANY 70 NOVA SS IN EXISTANCE"? PERIOD!!!

Now that I do not, or will not want to get into, like I said, I haven't seen the car SINCE JIM OWNED it. And on that note, HE was told, or told us that the original motor had broke the block and a rod though it, and eventually scraped. Therefore this motor was built in it's place. Much like my '69 396/350 car with a '72 402 built to 375hp specs.

I don't know about the cowl tag and rivets, but I have been on your site, and putting the CONN plate on it even looks like your trying to pass it off as something it's not, SORRY. I just hear so much about this in this field, and if I can shed some light on this for someone who has no $$$ into this car, might let others see what the car is, or was.

rubbinisracing
04-27-2007, 03:50 AM
Dear BigG,

First, It seems I was 50% wrong in my previous post. I want to say I'm sorry and hope you will accept my appology.

It's great to hear that the car has been re-united with the original engine. I'm sure with your considerable experience with million dollar cars you knew to document your efforts in obtaining the original engine. The names and phone numbers of the past owners of both the car and engine and your conversations with them will be of great interest to prospective buyers. Signed and notarized affidavits from those same people and a receipt for the purchase of the engine on letterhead or a pre-printed invoice with sellers name and address are great documentation. This would create a fantastic paper trail and along with the build sheet and GM of Canada paperwork are great provenance for your car. I have emailed a copy of this thread to myself and suggest you might do so as well, to include as part of such history keeping.

I'm sure you were already aware of the steps I suggested. But I wanted to make sure those less familar with what to look for in their due diligence had some idea of the questions they would be asked when selling their own car.

If you would care to share the tale of obtaining the original engine with all of us, we would enjoy it immensely. It would also keep you from having to tell the same story over and over as you could provide a link to this thread or email a copy to those genuinely interested in purchasing your car.

Best Regards,

Howard Cox
aka "rubbinisracing"
[email protected]

Hylton
04-27-2007, 06:28 AM
....and while you're explaining the engine retrieval, please explain how you saved a block with such destruction so our members can benefit from such knowledge. What kind of glue did you use?

Charley Lillard
04-27-2007, 06:38 AM
I didn't actually read what he said as having found the orig engine for the car. Let us please keep this civil.

Belair62
04-27-2007, 06:46 AM
Hylton...I wouldn't put a lot of faith in this statement either...cool looking car but it should be inspected by the buyer .Ultimately they have to be happy with the car.

[ QUOTE ]
And on that note, HE was told, or told us that the original motor had broke the block and a rod though it, and eventually scraped.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hylton
04-27-2007, 07:03 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I didn't actually read what he said as having found the orig engine for the car. Let us please keep this civil.

[/ QUOTE ]

Charley, this is the response to my asking if the car had it's born with engine:

[ QUOTE ]
About the engine this is not the first time nor will it be the last that an actual engine has been recovered.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the response implies he has recovered the original engine. Gary can clarify.

427king
04-27-2007, 07:23 AM
This story reminds me of every accusation lately,whether it be pointed toward a car owner or a Lacrosse player from Duke. The "accuser"[in this case a user with 2 posts] is always taken as credible without showing any proof of his claim, while the burden of proof is placed solely on the "accused". I dont know this car at all and im not siding with anyone, but why isnt anyone asking the accuser for proof of HIS claim.

Belair62
04-27-2007, 07:31 AM
Damn good question...EZNOVA...speak up....

Charley Lillard
04-27-2007, 07:47 AM
Hylton... I agree that is what most of us take from his comment but it really wasn't saying he had found the orig engine.

lowmile
04-27-2007, 03:23 PM
When I was a kid I would have my rearend "tore up" for lying. I also had it "tore up" for not telling the whole truth. m

kwhizz
04-27-2007, 03:47 PM
Maybe Gary(Big G) is a "Lawyer"..........Talks but really doesn't say anything that can be definative http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bs.gif......AKA "Lawyereze"
http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bs.gif
Ken

EZ Nova
04-27-2007, 04:11 PM
427King to reply to you about my crediblity seeing as I have only 2 posts. I'm only on here to learn as I love the Yenko cars. I do not have any real chance of owning such a rare and valuble car. I'm big into these cars and for once, I have first hand knowledge of this car. So I only pipe up when I know what I'm talking about. The guys on this site know TONS more about the things on these rare cars like Yenko, Dana, Nickey and the likes. I like to read there posts and this is most likely the closest I'll ever get to one, other then at shows. I am building a '69 CLONE YENKO Nova at this point in time out of my '69 SS Nova. This info really helps make it look close to the OEM ones.

Also, if you check, I haven't been on as I also change computers and 'net providers last Oct. and just found my username on my old system at work.

rubbinisracing
04-27-2007, 04:39 PM
[ QUOTE ]
2 About the engine this is not the first time nor will it be the last that an actual engine has been recovered.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've re-read this several times and don't think he left himself any wiggle room. If he had used "It wouldn't be" then yes he would have implied but not stated that he found the original engine.

Hylton
04-27-2007, 05:29 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
2 About the engine this is not the first time nor will it be the last that an actual engine has been recovered.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've re-read this several times and don't think he left himself any wiggle room. If he had used "It wouldn't be" then yes he would have implied but not stated that he found the original engine.

[/ QUOTE ]

That response is something you would get from a politician after asking a direct question. I asked a simple yes or no question and his response was as above. That in itself speaks volumes.

Again I will ask - Does the car have it's original "born with" engine?

Hylton
04-27-2007, 06:06 PM
[ QUOTE ]
This story reminds me of every accusation lately,whether it be pointed toward a car owner or a Lacrosse player from Duke. The "accuser"[in this case a user with 2 posts] is always taken as credible without showing any proof of his claim, while the burden of proof is placed solely on the "accused". I dont know this car at all and im not siding with anyone, but why isnt anyone asking the accuser for proof of HIS claim.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have in a PM.

mrrepodude
04-27-2007, 09:16 PM
squirm http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif yup... ummm, umm, ummm, kinda like herpes, the deceptions keep coming back http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif

mrrepodude
04-27-2007, 09:18 PM
Oh, and I am waiting the crafty response from the owner now that someone has emailed him pic's of the "ORIGINAL" block with the VIN # stamped on it .... Boy, this "story" keeps gettin better and better.. or is that worse and worse???

Hylton
04-27-2007, 10:16 PM
Jim,

Are you saying that you have proof that the original block is not in the car?

mrrepodude
04-27-2007, 10:36 PM
I personally do not have the photo if that is what you are asking. However, the person who has known this car for along time DOES have the original with the vin stamp ON IT and forwarded a pic the the owner http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif

Belair62
04-27-2007, 10:41 PM
Si Jim...repodude...did you own the car ??? So now we have no idea who is the one with deception since an earlier post said they "heard" the block was desroyed and rod kicked out....so now you are saying someone has a pic of the original block that they have ???? Instead of posting remarks like you know it is all deception....bring something concrete to the discussion...not hearsay that we have no idea who or what you are talking about. Either prove theblock is not the original...or quit acting like you know it is a re-stamp. Easy enough to prove if you have pics like you say you do.

Xplantdad
04-27-2007, 10:45 PM
Occasionally...this forum turns into a battle ground of unsubstantiated claims...and no one wins http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif

427king
04-27-2007, 10:49 PM
So someone had the presence of mind to take a pic of the engine pad stamp well over 15 years ago , then proceeded to destroy the block http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif Forgive me for being cynical, but this sounds more like a "i sold it not knowing it was an L78, now that i see it has canada paperwork and a 75K price tag im going to taint it" story to me.

Belair62
04-27-2007, 10:49 PM
Seems like a lot of insinuation going on but nobody has anythig YET to prove their claims....which is total bullshit

Hylton
04-27-2007, 10:52 PM
[ QUOTE ]
So someone had the presence of mind to take a pic of the engine pad stamp well over 15 years ago , then proceeded to destroy the block http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Or someone still has the grenaded block in his garage and just took some recent pictures. Whatever the case, it would be nice to see the pics.

427king
04-27-2007, 11:32 PM
Heres a hypothetical[actually it HAS happened to a friend of mine, but the cars im referring to below are fictional]. A guy sells a car that he doesnt know was a copo as the motor is gone and there is no paperwork for 5500.00. 3rs later the new owner finds the original block after doing some owner research. Seller is pissed he was unaware it was a valuable car and want revenge since the car sold on ebay for 175K and he saw it. So he restamps a block with a 325HP designation and the vin of the car and tells everyone including the new owner that the guy he originally sold the car to is a liar . Great payback huh??? Needless to say, no one believes the guy that sold it for 175K.

joey
04-27-2007, 11:34 PM
I completly agree with king show us proof that the engine he claims to have been found is not correct and do it now so you dont have time to make a restamp yourself knowledge of something dosent hold water you must have physical proof

Belair62
04-28-2007, 12:22 AM
Pics or ban.... http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/naughty.gif

WILMASBOYL78
04-28-2007, 01:18 AM
Seems like the boys on Steve's are following this car also..last post is very interesting.... http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/hmmm.gif

http://www.stevesnovasite.com/forums/showthread.php?t=61730

wilma

Belair62
04-28-2007, 01:59 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Now that I do not, or will not want to get into, like I said, I haven't seen the car SINCE JIM OWNED it. And on that note, HE was told, or told us that the original motor had broke the block and a rod though it, and eventually scraped. Therefore this motor was built in it's place. Much like my '69 396/350 car with a '72 402 built to 375hp specs.


[/ QUOTE ]

Sure would like to see those pics that were supposedly sent of a motor that was windowed and scrapped....and now it turns up again in 2 places....Mr G can you post them hereif they were sent to you so we can all see rather than just hear peoples claims ? If its restamped then just admit it and lower the price. It would be nice to put this to rest.

427king
04-28-2007, 02:15 AM
Im curious why 3 people would team up on a guy in 3 different internet forums to discredit him for all to see , and when asked for proof they send HIM the "picture" . Who saves a windowed 396 for 20 years anyway and doesnt give it wirh the car if they think its important enough to save in the first place ????? maybe the person that claims he has the original block can sell it to the current owner and they will both benefit.

1969z280
04-28-2007, 02:23 AM
427king:

I'm with you on this one. Why didn't an L78 Original Block go with the documented L78 Nova? I think both sides of this thing are %!##%**! Just my .02 http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bs.gif

Ed

Late BrakeU2
04-28-2007, 02:41 AM
It has become more of a biz and less of a hobby each day.

Hylton
04-28-2007, 03:00 AM
[ QUOTE ]
It has become more of a biz and less of a hobby each day.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep. It's all about the money. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/no.gif

Someone just posted on the Nova site that they are in posession of the original motor! http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/shocked.gif

Zedder
04-28-2007, 03:16 AM
Wow, I hope the owner of the motor (or at least the guy who claims to have it), posts the pics in this thread!

As for the money part, I agree, but I think those days are coming to a close fairly soon. Increased knowledge and skepticism of questionable cars is quickly bringing prices of all but the best of the best in line again. Every second car on ebay lately has been run at least a couple of times before it ever sells...and at a much lower price than original requested. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif

Hylton
04-28-2007, 03:34 AM
[ QUOTE ]
As for the money part, I agree, but I think those days are coming to a close fairly soon. Increased knowledge and skepticism of questionable cars is quickly bringing prices of all but the best of the best in line again. Every second car on ebay lately has been run at least a couple of times before it ever sells...and at a much lower price than original requested. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

As Martha Stewart would say - "And that's a good thing!"

BigG
04-28-2007, 04:14 AM
This will be my last reply on this matter.I won;t use actual names as I would prefer not to pregidious any pending up coming litigation. I bought this car over a year ago and attached to this car came a very interesting story. As the legend goes two 1970 Nova SS were owned by two brothers. The story went on to say for some strange reason they decided to swap engines in the late 70;s one car being my L78 and the other a L34.After purchasing the L78 Nova with the L34 engine, we made numerous attempts to obtain the info on the other Nova owner to recover the original engine.After numerous attempts and no luck we proceeded to find try and find him on our own. By addvertising his and our car vin no and story we hoped He would see it and contact us.In the search we got a call we were hoping for from a gentilman who claimed to have the L78 block with our vin no. However he knew nothing about our car or the other NOVA SS.Being very sceptical after after hearing the story's on the two cars .After having the block examined we paid for it, feeling confident it was the original motor .We completed the restoration and registered the car for sale at RM auction.Four days prior to the sale we get a e-mail from this so called gentleman posing as a buyer for my car.WE gave all info requested vin numbers casting ect.First thing he proceeded to do was falsely accuse me of re stamping the L 34 engine and dressing it up as a L 78. At this time he admitted to me he was the owner of the other L 34 NOVA SS and he was going to report me for engine restampin.I advised and assured him the L 34 was still safe and untouched in my warehouse and waiting for him upon reaching an agreement. At this time He now declared he had my engine in his car. I was shocked and amazed as I had already paid for and had inspected by a very knowledgeable Chevy guy. If what he claimed to be true I needed proof too pull the car from the auction and deal with the seller of the engine. I told him if in fact this was the case I would be more than happy too make any kind of trade to reunite both cars and engine;S. At this point he started to go sideways and backwards.He said he wanted his engine ,but wouldn't;t return mine nor would he call me or let me call him to discuss the matter. All he wanted was me to give him a price on his engine over e-mail which I would t do until he was able to provide me proof He had mine.What he was able to send me was a picture of top of a engine in a NOVA . I told him sorry not good enough so he sent me two shots of the engine pad with assembly dates and cko suffix ., with No Vin present at all and tried to declare this as absolute proof.What he implied at this point that if he could get his engine because he was financially handicapped and ill for some consideration that there would be no reason for him to send me his SUPPOSED original engine for my car as mine was already correct and his would never leave his car.IN RESPONSE to that I told him I would drop his engine off a cliff and for him to PISS OFF.Then he proceeded to e-mail RM auction and accused us of re stamping the NOVA and RM intern requested proof of this claim of which couldn;t provide.I do have the pictures and e-mails he sent to me and I sent to him which are in safe keeping. I will gladly post the pictures of his so called proof if somebody can advise me on doing so . At this point it is now over two weeks from when he first contacted us you would think by now he could have his engine stamped to match mine.And this is what has started all this nonsense on my car

Allen
04-28-2007, 04:16 AM
Okay, I'll step into this one even though I really don't have a dog in this fight. However, I hate to see something that appears to be misrepresented - especially considering that I'd love to have a car like this and would really be pi$$ed if I paid huge dollars for something that was not as I was lead to believe. Ask yourself if you'd be upset too.

It really comes down to one man's story against another. I won't take sides, but will present the information that was given to me and let you decide.

This comes from the person that has the facts, first-hand knowledge, details, and some back-up information. In the interest of clearing up a few questions on this forum, I'll relay the information that I have, including a summary in his own words.

The Nova on Ebay appears to really be a factory SS 396 L78 car. There is no dispute about that. I've attached a copy of the order sheet. The issue surrounds the original "born-with" matching-numbers engine that is advertised to be with it.

That Nova on Ebay and the one that my friend has were owned by the same person in the 70's. Both Novas were/are nearly identical in color and options (forest green, bench seats, 4-speeds, steel rims with dog-dish caps, etc). The primary differences were in the engine (L34 vs. L78, green vs. black interior, and exterior decoration (body side moldings vs. window trim).

As mentioned, one Nova was a factory L34 and the other was an L78. The L34 Nova was and is still a super nice low-mileage car that was taken good care of. The L78 had the issues typical with a Canadian weathered car and was the rougher car of the two.

The owner at the time decided to sell the factory L78 Nova and keep the factory L34 Nova. However, prior to selling it, he did a motor swap so that he'd have the more powerful L78 motor in the best condition car (the L34).

The transplanted L78 Nova (with its L34 engine) went on its merry way and is the yellow car you have seen prior to the restoration that is documented here.

http://www.angelfire.com/ut2/dpmusclecars/70novass.html

At this point, the Nova was still sporting the L34 from my friend's car. Somewhere in the restoration process, it become a matching-numbers L78 again. This can be a problem when the original L78 motor is still firmly anchored in another Nova.

Bottom line: There appears to be no blown-up grenaded engines, nor photos of one. There is only the factory original L78 for the car, and a "created" one in it now.

Here it is in his own words.
================================================== ========
The story behind the "matching numbers" documented L-78 1970 Nova SS on ebay is this. The VIN to this car is 114270W358856. This car was owned, along with the present day 1970 Nova SS Big Block car which i now own 114270W298215, by one and the same fellow in Hamilton, Ontario in the mid 70's to mid 80's.

I have had contact with this prior owner for several years now and he has told me of the engine swap between the two cars which he himself did back in '78. I have also multiple vintage photos of both cars together with the engines pulled, side by side, awaiting the swap, and a long history on both cars when they resided as a pair. I have had the 358856 Nova on my radar screen for a while now, and have viewed it as recent as '06 when it was Old Yellow and owned by Jim H. in Hamilton.

I viewed the car personally and know the engine code to have been T0324 CTX 298215 at that recent date, the match to my present car.

I tried to work a deal on the purchase of either the car or just the motor so as to get my "original" factory motor back but it didn't work out. In 'spring of '06 the 358856 Nova was sold and taken to auction in Toronto and purchased by the current seller. I saw a link to the restoration of this car online by the seller and immediately recognized the car as the one which I knew to be the mate to the one I now own.

Upon asking the seller about the engine after restoration, he quickly offered me the #'s on the engine pad and they matched exactly the engine pad #'s on the car I now own. My present engine being the one that was "factory installed" in the 358856 Nova on Ebay.

When confronted with this, the seller quickly said that the engine in the car was pulled and he "LOCATED" the factory original engine by some stroke of luck since he purchased the car at auction.

So, now there exist 2 1970 Nova Big Block cars with the same exact engine code and VIN. One being the original and one a "re-stamp".

Which one is the real deal? You be the judge. He kept asking for a photo of the stamping on mine, and with the engine installed and hoses and lines in the way, it is no easy task. One can see it clearly with the naked eye but all the camera can catch is the initial "heavier stamp" of the TO603CKO...the 358856 is visible to the naked eye but with many attempts it can't be captured by the camera lens. I tried for over an hour today and couldn't get a sight on the # through the lens. I invite anyone to view it and it will clearly show the VIN to be the same exact one to the 358856 car for sale now.

I know my engine to be the one and true L-78 engine and not tampered with in the past 37 years.

Maybe the seller should share with us how he happened to come across this engine after almost 30 years of seperation and multiple owners........ should be interesting.

This is the true story behind the 2 Nova Big Blocks..coming full circle once again.

P.S. the b/w copy of the insurance binder is to show that both cars were owned by the same owner in Hamilton, Ont. back in the day along with some other truck. This puts both cars together at the time the swap was done.

================================================== ==

Here are some photos:
http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q65/nova_ss396/G.jpg
http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q65/nova_ss396/InsurancebinderforbothNovasin78.jpg
http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q65/nova_ss396/L-78padstamping1.jpg
http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q65/nova_ss396/My70NovaL-78photos094.jpg
http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q65/nova_ss396/My70NovaL-78photos095.jpg



PLEASE note that nothing slanderous to the seller of that car or anyone else is intended by the post. It's just a presentation of some history.

Unfortunately, none of this would even be discussed if the car was advertised or being sold as a factory L78 with a non-original motor. That's not such a bad thing at all either. All Novas are cool, whether matching numbers or not.

Anyway, that's the information that I have. Again, nothing is being posted with the intention of disrespecting anyone or calling them out. It's all about the car itself.

If I wanted to really start the mud-slinging, I'd have posted copies of the hateful and threatening emails that were sent by the seller to the gentleman who merely inquired about the and mentioned actually having the factory born-with motor. Those notes weren't cool at all and were quite rude and nasty. It's quite a shame that people need to conduct themselves that way. People tend to lose their civility when blinded by greed (just my observation).

To wrap this up, here's a shot of that L78 motor that SHOULD be in that Nova on Ebay.

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q65/nova_ss396/My70NovaL-78photos012.jpg
http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q65/nova_ss396/My70NovaL-78photos026.jpg

SuperNovaSS
04-28-2007, 04:27 AM
You mean you wouldn't pull a few hoses and brackets to get your original engine back. Now that is lazy.



Jason

Belair62
04-28-2007, 04:28 AM
Thanks Allen....now people can decide what they want to think if they are interested in the car...

Allen
04-28-2007, 04:36 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Thanks Allen....now people can decide what they want to think if they are interested in the car...

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm going to quote Rodney King and say "Why can't we all just get along?".

The cars are what they are. You'd think people could amicably work things out, especially given the unique story about the cars and the fact that both they and their respective motors still exist.

I'm just not a fan of the whole restamping thing, whether the seller did it or someone sold him a restamped motor. With the dollars being asked for a nice car like that, no one needs to be mislead if there is more information available.

Belair62
04-28-2007, 05:38 AM
The fact that th cars and both engines still exists is pretty cool. Restamping sucks. Maybe after the dust settles this can get worked out . People just love drama.

Charley Lillard
04-28-2007, 05:59 AM
Thankyou Allen for presenting a polite factual seeming manner.

427king
04-28-2007, 06:24 AM
Im so used to seeing stamp pads with straight stampings.

joey
04-28-2007, 06:39 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Im so used to seeing stamp pads with straight stampings.

[/ QUOTE ]Thats funny you should say that jerry m said that one of mine looked like a amature restamp because 2 of the numbers are not perfectly aligned he said they used a gang stamp and they should be perfect oh well I really dont care I like the car any way

Charley Lillard
04-28-2007, 06:57 AM
Can we see a pic of it Joey ?

Hylton
04-28-2007, 07:29 AM
Now about that paid members only can post in classifieds......

EZ Nova
04-28-2007, 08:30 AM
Allen, thanks for clearing that up. I guess I was wrong/mislead from years ago about the motor being broke. For that, I'm sorry. I was just passing on info that I recall from knowing this car for years as well.

1970ChevelleSS
04-28-2007, 05:38 PM
So does the guy who claims to have the original motor have the wrong motor in his car?

olredalert
04-28-2007, 06:17 PM
------BigG,,,Give it up. If you reign this in right now and do the right thing you can still salvage this. Get your original engine back. Help get the 350hp motor back in the correct hole and you can still hold your head up. As a matter of fact, Id add the cost of all this to the price as this story line will probably support the higher price. Hey,,, youre left with a good 396/375 engine for another project too. In the end it doesnt matter where you got the engine in the car today because it simply isnt the original, IMHO!!!........Bill S

x Baldwin Motion
04-28-2007, 07:20 PM
[ QUOTE ]
So does the guy who claims to have the original motor have the wrong motor in his car?

[/ QUOTE ]

The right guy claims to have the wrong motor in his car, that motor, he claims is for the right car, which the wrong guy has. It's pretty simple to follow after reading it six times and assuming everyone is telling the truth. Hopefully the interested parties can work it out and get everything where it belongs and grind down the fake pad.

joey
04-28-2007, 08:04 PM
I dont want to open up that can of worms again charlie surely you understand

joey
04-28-2007, 08:06 PM
I would love to see a pic of both cars side by side agin this year with a motor swap being preformed now that would be cool!!!!!!! http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif

Late BrakeU2
04-28-2007, 08:18 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So does the guy who claims to have the original motor have the wrong motor in his car?

[/ QUOTE ]

The right guy claims to have the wrong motor in his car, that motor, he claims is for the right car, which the wrong guy has.

[/ QUOTE ]


http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif






"This is like deja vu all over again."

"You can observe a lot just by watching."

"He must have made that before he died." -- Referring to a Steve McQueen movie.


"I'd find the fellow who lost it, and, if he was poor, I'd return it." -- When asked what he would do if he found a million dollars.


"You've got to be very careful if you don't know where you're going, because you might not get there."

"I knew I was going to take the wrong train, so I left early."

"If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else."

"If you can't imitate him, don't copy him."

"You better cut the pizza in four pieces because I'm not hungry enough to eat six."


"It was impossible to get a conversation going; everybody was talking too much."


"A nickel isn't worth a dime today."

"Nobody goes there anymore; it's too crowded."

"It gets late early out there." -- Referring to the bad sun conditions in left field at the stadium.



"Do you mean now?" -- When asked for the time.

"I take a two hour nap, from one o'clock to four."

"If you come to a fork in the road, take it."

"You give 100 percent in the first half of the game, and if that isn't enough in the second half you give what's left."

"90% of the putts that are short don't go in."

"I made a wrong mistake."


"I always thought that record would stand until it was broken."

"Yeah, but we're making great time!" -- In reply to "Hey Yogi, I think we're lost."

"If the fans don't come out to the ball park, you can't stop them."



"It's never happened in the World Series competition, and it still hasn't."

"How long have you known me, Jack? And you still don't know how to spell my name." -- Upon receiving a check from Jack Buck made out to "bearer."


"The other teams could make trouble for us if they win."



"I never blame myself when I'm not hitting. I just blame the bat, and if it keeps up, I change bats. After all, if I know it isn't my fault that I'm not hitting, how can I get mad at myself?"

"

"I didn't really say everything I said."

WILMASBOYL78
04-29-2007, 01:36 AM
One of my Grandfather's favorites was: "It looked so nice out this morning, that I decided to leave it out all day"


wilma http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif

John
04-29-2007, 03:25 AM
...Who's on first?
http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggthumpup.gif

Late BrakeU2
04-29-2007, 05:33 AM
[ QUOTE ]

...Who's on first?
http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggthumpup.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Restamps on first

Numbers matching on second

And I dunno's on third http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/no.gif

Allen
04-29-2007, 05:36 PM
Here's another VIN pad picture after it was cleaned up a litle more.

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q65/nova_ss396/enginecode3.jpg

Allen
04-29-2007, 09:32 PM
http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q65/nova_ss396/L78enginestamplarge-1.jpg

d_n_m69
04-29-2007, 11:16 PM
YES ALLEN , true story !!! good job .I owned the L34 IN THE 80'S LOW MILE CAR LIKE NEW !! PURCHASED IT FROM ONE OF THE BROTHER'S .I SOLD IT TO A GUY IN THURDER BAY OR NORTH BAY ?? IN 1987-88-89 ??

JRSully
04-30-2007, 03:31 AM
Allen is that a real stamnping or a fake.?

Allen
04-30-2007, 03:46 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Allen is that a real stamnping or a fake.?

[/ QUOTE ]

The real one.

JRSully
04-30-2007, 04:51 AM
That is what I thought Al because my 70 L78 Nova (a month behind that Car) has the EXACT same stamping, especially on the VIN, it is almost invisible on the top and deep on the bottom, wasn't a square hit at the factory on the VIN stamp

YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY
04-30-2007, 05:13 PM
Allen, nice job outlining the story - I was losing track of who-had-what.

So, the current seller restamped the L34 block? Now the L34 owner's engine will need a restamp to bring the numbers back in line? What a shame http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/no.gif

olredalert
04-30-2007, 05:14 PM
-------Jim,,,Those numbers were whacked with the head on of course, and because of that were often light on the up side. Just think about the guy with the hammer and how he might get the gang holder a little too close to the head, and this is what you get.........Bill S

Charley Lillard
04-30-2007, 05:32 PM
No Marlin. The seller says he still has the orig engine in his shop.

YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY
04-30-2007, 05:52 PM
Oh, that's good. So, there is an opportunity for both cars to get their original engines back - forget who owns what, reunite the engines!!

Hylton
04-30-2007, 09:31 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Oh, that's good. So, there is an opportunity for both cars to get their original engines back - forget who owns what, reunite the engines!!

[/ QUOTE ]

Somehow I don't think that is going to happen. Too much pride and ego in the way.

1969l78
05-04-2007, 10:59 PM
Well its back, says numbers matching, and non finer. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1970-NOVA...1QQcmdZViewItem (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1970-NOVA-SS-396-L78-4-SPEED_W0QQitemZ250111517939QQihZ015QQcategoryZ6172 QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem)

1969L78Nova
05-04-2007, 11:20 PM
Lots of nice photos...If I was to drop $70+K on E-Bay I would at least like to see photos of the COWL TAG / VIN TAG ENGINE and TRANS STAMP...Let's see EM !

EZ Nova
05-04-2007, 11:43 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Lots of nice photos...If I was to drop $70+K on E-Bay I would at least like to see photos of the COWL TAG / VIN TAG ENGINE and TRANS STAMP...Let's see EM !

[/ QUOTE ]

1969, look though this thread and there are there, or on the website. The one post already claims the rivets look "funny"???

Now that this car is in the USA, and it's pretty much been determined that the motor IS NOT THE BORN WITH, and mileage is NOT WHAT HE CLAIMS, should a call to the FBI or some other law-enforcement agency be in line, since he does not seem to take a hint? There's seems to be proof as far back as 1970 from another member that he DOESN'T have the born with motor, but found it, when it's in another car???

EZ Nova
05-12-2007, 05:51 PM
Well I see there's not been a lot said or done about the FRAUD that this guys is doing, and shows not regret? It has been posted on another forum as a response to my above post that with this car being "FOR SALE" in NY, that it SHOULD be reported to the NY State department of motor Vehicles for "mile-roll back" and the motor "RE-STAMP"? This guy is only worried about the $$$, PERIOD. Nothing more, nothing less. It's been exposed on here with the WRONG miles listed on eBay, but still not changed on HIS auction? Or even says that the motor VIN is in question.
IF you look up the posts by "BigG' on THIS site, it's ONLY for "cars for sale" or someone selling that he can buy and flip? NOTHING to help with resto's or any info from other members, always on the sale or purchase of a car?
So with MY past being brought up with only a couple of post at the time, this guy has been using THIS site as part of his sale network. And now that he has shown his true colours with the discription of the car, re-stamped motor, and misleading mileage, maybe more members should look into the FRAUD part of this too.

I WILL BE CALLING MONDAY!

Belair62
05-13-2007, 06:06 AM
A lot of people come on here to just sell stuff. If there are skeletons...it usually gets exposed here which is good.