++2009 CAMARO VIDEO ++

[Z-11 396]

++ Video ++ of the New 2009 Camaro Convt. at the Woodward Dream Cruise....Kasey

http://video.lsxtv.com/video_detail.php?mId=1700

[flyingn]

looks like a winner. But I have seen the car many times in person and I still like the Challanger better.. Checy will sell a million tho.. no doubt

[six-corners]

Car is too damn ugly. Why can't GM do anything right anymore?

[GRB]

What does it weigh and will there still be a mkt for cars like this at it's price point in 2009?? Could be another SSR.

[m22mike]

[ QUOTE ]
Car is too damn ugly. Why can't GM do anything right anymore?

[/ QUOTE ]

Good ! I am glad you said it first, I think it SUX, How come Ford build a Stang that looks cool. I can't put my finger on it but somthing about the car is to new looking. I have seen the Red car and the Orange vert in person, there just OK.
Mike

[LS6 RAT]

I can tell you what it is, it's too damn thick. I think most would agree that there needs to be more of a tapered look to the front and rear facias. The '69 Camaro and '70, '71 Challengers are just simply beautiful in their body lines. They both have that tapered front and rear appearances.
Even though the Mustang does have a somewhat appealing look to it. If you compare it to a '67 or '68 Shelby front end, they are also to damn thick. That's what the stylists just don't get.

[Mr70]

..." I can't put my finger on it but something about the car is to new looking."
..."I can tell you what it is, it's too damn thick."
I agree with both of you,and in one answer,Because Cadillac engineers designed it.

http://www.autonews24h.com/files/2006-Cadillac-XLR.jpg

[jannes_z-28]

One of the reasons new cars are "think" or high-nosed is regulations from governments to minimize injuries on pedestrians. There are a lot of regulations that decides how car have to look. The lownosed 4th gen Camaros was killed because of such regulations (among other things)


Jan