View Full Version : Ok Guys......Opinions Please
juliosz
12-11-2007, 04:26 AM
A friend of mine is interested in this car: 70 RS Z w/Air (http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1970-1-2-CHEVROLET-CAMARO-RS-POSSIBLY-A-RARE-RS-Z28_W0QQitemZ320191992291QQihZ011QQcategoryZ6161QQ ssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem) My opinion of the car is yes it could possibly be a real 70 Z w/factory air but unless you have some bullet proof documentation to prove that, it will always be questioned. What do you guys think? http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/flag.gif
juliosz
12-11-2007, 04:29 AM
Oh, and also if it was a factory job, would it have some sort of unique prefix for the engine build code?
Xplantdad
12-11-2007, 04:36 AM
I don't know about 70 Z28's but shouldn't it have a 12 bolt? http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/hmmm.gif
Looks like a lot of work...
As far as a Z28 with AC...I have no clue...though I thought they never came with it...the whole solid lifter-high revving engine reason... http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/hmmm.gif
dkatap
12-11-2007, 04:47 AM
It is missing everything a real Z28 should have except emblems, and they are in the wrong locations.
Dennis
juliosz
12-11-2007, 04:59 AM
Yeah, just got a good look at the pics and you're right, not much correct there....wrong tach, etc. Looks like possibly a trim tag mistake, not about the AC but the Z28.
JRSully
12-11-2007, 05:05 AM
I thought 73 was the first year for A/C in a Z.?
69LM1
12-11-2007, 05:13 AM
Correct. 73 was first year for air. 70 was first year for auto, last year for 12 bolt.
That car has been listed several times.
Not a real Z IMHO,
Rich
akcamaro
12-11-2007, 05:33 AM
The car has been discused, and torn apart, here.
http://www.nastyz28.com/forum/showthread.php?t=105627
to summarize; Faked tag, and lacking all the Z stuff (8K tach, floor mount gas pedal, rear "bummper-etes", 12 bolt) and it shouldn't have A/C.
GTO_DON
12-11-2007, 05:36 AM
somebody definetly embossed that tag!!! http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/eek.gif
DarrenX33
12-11-2007, 05:23 PM
[ QUOTE ]
somebody definetly embossed that tag!!! http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/eek.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
AND HOW! It would have been more convincing written in crayola. http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif
70 Forest Green Zee
12-11-2007, 06:13 PM
Not a real Z...should have the 8000 rpm tach with a 6500 redline! Sellers like this really piss me off! http://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/thumbsdown.gif
DarrenX33
12-11-2007, 06:23 PM
And speaking of.... If you want a nice Z, we all know this ONE (http://www.cars-on-line.com/33688.html) ...
Stefano
12-11-2007, 06:38 PM
Didn't know Randy's was for sale? Did he find something else? That is a sweet Z28.
Canucklehead
12-11-2007, 07:21 PM
Even if it is fake he's not asking to much for a decent driver
pSYCo
12-12-2007, 09:29 PM
....no brake booster.........
Z COOKS
12-13-2007, 04:37 AM
Someone did a terrible job faking that tag, there should be a law against crap like that........
mssl72
12-15-2007, 07:16 PM
The tag almost looks like somebody laid bondo on it and shaped the "Z28 . 10". Lots of scratches around it. What's with the "." ??
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.