Hose Review
2 Attachment(s)
Fusick 3/4"
|
Hose Review
In my opinion, the 5/8" from Dr.Rebuild is as dead-nuts to original as I've seen. It's smooth without the tell-tale sign of the underlying cord pattern. Although my year doesn't have the repeated printed GM, the quality is excellent. It's machined applied, not rubber-stamped ink. Untraceable when removed with rag and lacquer thinner. The Fusick is also dead-nuts smooth without the cord pattern. The only drawback with the Fusick is the rib pattern. As you can see in the pic, there are four same width ribs not the three as most accept as original.
|
Hose Review
1 Attachment(s)
Dr.Rebuild 5/8" GM print. I'm not that familiar with the font that was used, so those that are, please comment.
|
1 Attachment(s)
For comparison, original hoses on a '67 396 Chevelle.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Maybe your typo? But the 5/8 hose has no ribs.
I can't guarantee that the Vette's heater hoses are original but they satisfy the NCRS purists. The 3/4 hose is a dead match but the 5/8 hose is very slightly different than the Chevelle hose and varies slightly from the NCRS judging guide specs in the spacing. Splitting hairs here. - Bill W |
I'm thinking maybe PaceCar Jeff ink stamps hoses??
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.