![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
Here's another data point on this. Exact same date and the same fonts as the first one. I'm thinking it legit.
|
Not to hijack, and I’m no expert either, but that 1111498 looks like the “9” started life as a “3”.
|
The real 9 should have a distinct radius on top and bottom where the round meets the tail.
|
Quote:
|
Dave, is this for your car? I'm no expert on stamping S so I will let the experts decide. The date seems early for an 04B car. My 04D Van Nuys car has an 0C18 distributor.
Buddy |
Yeah, its for my car.
It may be a bit early for an 04B. Not sure what the cutoff would be. There was a guy with a 69 04B that had an original dizzy that he said was a December date. Since production didn't get rolling on the 70's until January there may be a bit of latitude there. My original starter is a January build. An 0C18 would be ideal. I also ran across this post on NastyZ28: http://nastyz28.com/threads/1112019-...2#post-1513685 |
It is my opinion that the 019 has been restamped.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This distributor has the same characteristics for the NUMBER 2... short tail and seems like an abbreviated edge on the curve in the 2 as well. |
Well right or wrong its mine now. I won the auction at 560. One other bidder. No time for buyers remorse. I actually thought it would go higher.
It was the last part on my list. Thanks for everyone who participated with comments. 70lt1z28@nastyz28 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.