The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Lounge (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=87)
-   -   Need a "BE"? (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=85833)

69L72RS 03-13-2006 08:13 PM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
Hey Eric,
Which one am I Eric J.#1 or Eric J.#2.
Does it go by age???
If so, you're #1 https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...iggthumpup.gif
Later,
The Other Eric

VintageMusclecar 03-13-2006 09:03 PM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
Eric;

Well, since I have the earlier registered date, I guess I'll be "Eric J. #1" https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif

Eric

Lynn 03-13-2006 11:53 PM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
[ QUOTE ]
That is a BS answer. Heartbeat probably has more real rare Camaro parts than anyone in the country so calling it a fake seems out of line without a better answer. If he had a "Buy it now" of 1500.00 I might be inclined to believe it was a stamped piece but his price is up there.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would have to agree. Jim's prices are usually up there, and he isn't much for giving "deals", but I have dealt with him several times, and find him to be an honest guy. He does have some parts that are very difficult to find elsewhere.

I also remember him stating in one auction that he would not stamp a date code on an undated part, because it was agains "Heartbeat Ciy policy". Have to respect that.

Just my 02 cents.

Lynn

70-SS/RS-L78 03-14-2006 02:19 AM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
I would love to know how he got them tubes looking so good when he restored this rear? They look great…

nuch_ss396 03-14-2006 02:28 AM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/hmmm.gif Yeah, that's what I said! https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/hmmm.gif

I wonder if it was a southwest car. Anyone else ever
seen axle tubes this pristine? Could it me NOS? Does
such a thing exist?

Steve

Jeff H 03-14-2006 02:42 AM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
Most Camaros that had BE rears weren't exactly daily driver's if you know what I mean. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...ns/naughty.gif I would think a lot of BE rears spent time on race cars that were stored in garages. But the date on that rear seems pretty early doesn't it? I can't read it so well but looks like BE0116? Wouldn't that most likely make it a rear off a Yenko or ZL1?

Paul D 03-14-2006 08:39 AM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
There car I'm looking at that the seller says has an original BE rear end. The numbers stamped on it are
BE 1025G1 with an E stamped underneath. Is that within the range of production?

The car is being sold as a Yenko clone.

Paul

69L72RS 03-14-2006 04:24 PM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
Paul,
I know this is off the main thread topic, but here is my answer to your question.
The rears that I have seen date from mid Nov 68 to late Sept 69.
IMO the rear is too early and late for a 69 rear.
I believe the first ZL1 rears were mid-late Nov to early Dec 68 and the last COPO cars were early October 69.
Kurt S. should be able to give a more accurate opinion on this.

If the car is a clone, I wouldn't worry about it unless the seller is using the rear to boost the price of the car.
If so, ask to inspect/verify that the posi and r&p set are really correct COPO parts. If it has the wrong internals, the rear is at best 75% incorrect, assuming the housing is authentic (again just my opinion).

Hope this helps and wasn't too long winded,
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif
Eric

ANDY M 03-14-2006 07:25 PM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
Here is what a real BE ring gear looks like.

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1.../RingGear2.jpg

Since Jim clearly says in the ad that he has a correct R&P set for sale, not included in this ad, a buyer would have to check with him about a price for the whole assembly. He may be willing to deal.
Money talks, and this is not an auction, but an advertisment with a price.


69L72RS 03-14-2006 08:29 PM

Re: Need a "BE"?
 
When I spoke to Jim about the rear he did mention having a correct r&p set that was available. I think he said it was a 1970 dated set. At that time, he did not know if the carrier was the correct original 3916234 unit.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.