Re: Is "stance" important?
 

https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...7010.jpg_r.jpg
This picture is from Easter weekend in Thruxton, England. The American Muscle was ever present. This car did particularly well winning its class. Impressive to say the least.

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

man, I love your black car, one of my favourites on here

https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...amaro011_1.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

The beast is back. Just needs a little cleaning up, and some maintenance. [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/sick.gif[/img]

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...5/P4200001.jpg

http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...5/P4200003.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

Stance IS important.

So is camera angle.

Please ignore the paint. Has been polished in a couple places, wet sanded and unpolished in others, and still completely uncut in others.
Hoping to paint stripes this week, then sand the whole car and have it buffed.
The following 3 shots were all taken within seconds of each other. No changes made to the car. The car in reality sits 5/8 inch lower in the front. Factory Z/28 would sit .38 inch higher in the front (of course, the AIM calls ro +- .38, so who knows).

From some angles the car actually looks lower in rear, and some it looks way higher in the rear.
Original size tires on the car for now. I have the YH wheels for it, but these are FW. Still need to blast and paint the YH wheels.
BTW, I also like the stance on my old 306,000 mile bimmer in the back ground on shot #3.

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

I think you nailed it Lynn. Nice job.

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lynn</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Stance IS important.

So is camera angle. </div></div>

I prefer a low rear-quartering shot:

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a2...ps8db54c7d.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

Low Rear quarter shot

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

They do indeed look good from that angle.

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 427TJ</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lynn</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Stance IS important.

So is camera angle. </div></div>

I prefer a low rear-quartering shot:

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a2...ps8db54c7d.jpg </div></div>

best one yet..

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

Here is one I picked up awhile back. No engine, but you get the idea.