Re: Is "stance" important?
 

<span style="font-size: 20pt"><span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF6600">Stance in June 2011 . . .</span>
</span></span>
http://www.northshoreclub.net/_asset...hevelle_12.jpg

http://www.northshoreclub.net/_asset...evelle_10z.jpg
<span style="font-size: 20pt"><span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="color: #FF6600">Just like the day I bought it new in Aug 1969 . . .
(both pictures from 2011)</span>
</span></span>

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

Nice 62 &quot;YES&quot;and 69 too.

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

that Biscane is sweet

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

Finally, some decent weather!

https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics...4848-image.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

The fellow that edits the Jalopy Journal has this Riv. Hands down my favorite look I've ever seen on one of these. Stance, wheels and tires are perfect. REAL Borrani 15&quot; wires, Repro 7.75-15 Goldlines. Just killer. [img][/img]

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

Nice look on that &quot;jalopy&quot;!

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: tom406</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> [img][/img] </div></div>

Hard to beat a properly-stanced (and proper wheel/tire) Rivi.

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

This 69 is one of my favorites. I think the stance is dead on-love the up in the air look-front and rear with a slight rake. Cragars are 15x8 reversed(deep dish) rear and 14x6 front with L60-15 rear and E78-14 front.

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

New stance with new wheels. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics...0526_00493.jpg

Re: Is "stance" important?
 

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: whitetop</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This 69 is one of my favorites. I think the stance is dead on-love the up in the air look-front and rear with a slight rake. Cragars are 15x8 reversed(deep dish) rear and 14x6 front with L60-15 rear and E78-14 front. </div></div>

PERFECT.