Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

I noticed on the other site. They still don't have clue as always. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...emlins/eek.gif

Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

The train is coming!!!!!!!!!!!! https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...iggthumpup.gif

Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

Howie...your message box is full.......

Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...iggthumpup.gif

Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

[ QUOTE ]
Thats what I would like to do. But warren sold the papers to a previous owner and there for can not give me copy's. If YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY would like to call Warren then it can be resolved.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you say it's Yenko Chev. vs. Yenko SC then I'll believe it, I recall it was Yenko SC - but I could be thinking of a different car's paperwork, since I don't have a copy in front of me.

Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

I read the post from Greg Carlson on the rabbit site about me & Mick Price. Well Greg you keep wanting the Truth. Well here it comes!!! This is what I know. Mick Price bought the car and talked to Vinnce E. he was told it may not be a 427 car because the price, it was sold for less that the other ones. Mick sold the car unrestored to Gary Dyer explaining to Gary what Vinnce told him. Bill Dyer Gary's son called Vinnce & they talked about the car. Bill thought the car could have discounted because of it one of the last 7 sold. Vinnce didn't agree. Gary decided to sell it because there no way to prove it was a 427. He sold it to guy in Iowa. HINT. att. is picture. The third guy from the left is the buyer. The car is retored as a 427 Yenko Nova by him. It was shown at the Nova Nats' in Cedar Rapids,Ia. Was there any paper work with the car at that time I don't know??? But I looked at the car there and there was a cert. stating it was in fact a yenko 427 Nova. The cert. came from the guy to the left of the owner in the att. picture. Greg you stated that the SWC was involved in this. Huh!!! Doesn't look like it to me!!!!! He who lives in a glass house shouldn't throw rocks. Kim Howie https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...emlins/eek.gif

Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

So does anyone know how many of the 67, 68 Camaros and 69 Novas were not converted to 427 cars? Are there any good guesstimates like 10%, 25%? Also, shouldn't some of the cars be removed from the lists as the history on them is uncovered and shows they were purchased as 396 cars like this Nova and the Firemist Nova? Or they should be footnoted at least to show no conversion was done. Do the 67 Camaro lists show which 427 was installed because I thought Don offered several 427's which were different(410hp vs 425hp)?

Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

[ QUOTE ]
Greg you stated that the SWC was involved in this

[/ QUOTE ] Kim...this guy is like Sybil....no one at all listens to him. He was the guy who used to own a LS6 pilot car right ? And the same shmoe who wanted to start an LS6 club but everyone laughed at him ? this just shows how believable he really is with the facts he provides...as usual..none..If you click on the "F" in my signature it shows a pic of him...looks like the usual characters involved once again...

Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

Same guys different car. What a suprise. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/bs.gif

Re: 1969 Yenko Nova
 

I'd like to know where the group at the "other" web site come down on this sort of collector car creativity? I notice that group is eager to be critical of anything/anyone sYc, but get amnesia when it comes to cars that are owned, restored or brokered via their own core group. This is one example of what I see as the real problem in this hobby. Some, on the other forum site, claim all the problem cars come from the sYc group, yet this Deuce was restored, certified and sold by one guy in the picture and is now owned by another guy in the same picture. 6-7 years ago, the same two guys had a hand in the red '69 Nova...one owned it and had it restored as a 427 Yenko Nova and the other guy certified it as a 427 Yenko conversion. The hobby seems to tolerate things like stripe color change, adding TT mag wheels, under dash gauges, circa incorrect tires, custom exhaust systems and headers, smog systems gone missing and other added do-dads that the factory/conversion shop order sheet didn't call out...so why is it so wrong for an owner to add/change the carburetor or slightly different paint color hue? It's a rhetorical question...we all know it's the hate-game that causes the personal bashing and gang attacks on anything sYc. Some claim the sYc is at the root of the problem and/or the only problem. With nearly 4,000 registered members and over 500 supporting members, I'd say the sYc is indeed the PREMIER supercar web site. Generally, the people that disagree have a personal bone to pick with one or more of the core group here. Unfortunately, the pictures below depict what I perceive to be the worst of the worst at deception with intent to defraud. Efforts to stop/expose this sort of foul play is time well spent, IMO, but you be the judge. We're accused of having a "flock" mentality here and being nothing more than Clary clan followers that are afraid/reluctant to speak up...how does that theory apply regarding this situation and the core group from the "other" forum site? https://www.yenko.net/attachments/235623-untitled.jpg