Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

That being the law, illegal cars are out there. I guess if found out the car would be impounded, correct Steve?

Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

Great thread going here! . So when is replacing enough metal that includes the Vin tag itself enough to "blur" the line of tag re & re....a whole cowl maybe or just enough to not disturb the rivets? . And is removal and replacement of metal like a hidden Vin and surrounding metal considered illegal? . Like a few guys have noted, whatever is considered legal or not is a different situation than Copo certification or values. . Again if the whole history of what's been done is open knowledge and or part of a sales contract, at least there's not intent to defraud. ~ Pete

Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

[ QUOTE ]
Do it right, but, when it comes time to sell, same rule applies, you gotta be honest.


[/ QUOTE ]
That means someone having something rebodied would disclose it and take a ton less money for the car...in muscle cars I don't think we are seeing the honesty factor kicking in....should we somehow miraculously get all people to disclose this stuff what would the difference in value be ? Should there be a difference in value ? When a car gets the rebody name associated with it people seem to stay away from them...if the same car was disclosed will it be easier to sell ? Obviously people in the musclecar world would prefer NOT to buy a rebodied car and thats why these things stay "secret". For the most part you only "heard" that this car or that car was rebodied or firewalled or whatever...people aren't slapping signs on them proudly proclaiming that heritage yet.

Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

If all people were honest it would, in fact, be a miracle. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif

So, if an original ZL1 Camaro is discovered and it needs extensive sheet metal, people will 'stay away from it' or 'it will be worth a ton less money'? That doesn't seem reasonable to me, but, I am not as tuned in to these cars as well as most here. Is it really documented that rare cars (i. e. COPO Camaro's) that are the 'Real Deal' that need sheet metal are not desireable? If a COPO that is all original brings 200G's, one that has a beautiful resto using some donor sheet metal is worth what? Both have the original drive train and are documented.

Over on the dark side (Corvettes) the difference would not be nearly so great.

Regards,

Mark

Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

I am a buyer for any cheap, documented, original drive train, known history COPO and rare cars needing sheet metal. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif

Regards,

Mark

Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

I don't think belair is talking about cars that "need alot of sheetmetal" , he's talking about cars that NEEDED alot of sheetmetal, but instead got the tags and specific items transfered to a non-supercar body. THOSE are the cars people tend to shy away from.

Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

Joe,

Thanks for clearing that up for me. I didn't quite get that the way it was intended.

With that being said, you get a ZL1 that is documented with original drivetrain and known history. It is, unquestionably, the real deal. The body is history. Everything is rusted out and beat to dickens and there is nothing much useful remaining, You now find a beautiful donor car and transfer the drivetrain and sub frame over to the donor. The trim tags are attached properly and a world class resto is performed. Are people really going to shy away or are they really only going to pay a fraction for a car like this? It doesn't make common sense to me. I would be a buyer on a car like that with no hesitation.

Listen, I would prefer an all original car, just like anyone else, but, I would not hesitate to pay strong money for the re-bodied car. It would not be a big money road block.

I believe super rare pieces, such as COPO, L88, Boss 429, etc, are not that greatly affected by such things.

Regards,

Mark

Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

The problem lies in the fact that musclecars or really any car that has had a new or different body shell installed always was and always will be worth much less to a "collector." The enthusiast might not care as much, but the collector does. Since the vast majority here and on other musclecar websites will say they are "collectors" even if only owning a single car, the stigma stays.

Since we are talking persumably about GM "supercars" I find it somewhat humorous and naive when people on this website slam rebodies, as to a large degree you guys are the reason people are doing it in the first place. How many Yenko Camaros, Chevelles, Novas, and other supercars have been sold and flipped multiple times here for mega profit. The post and classifieds here are filled with cars that were bought on Sunday and sold the following Monday..lol I guarantee if people who primarily make up this website sat and thought about it they could name 2-3 dozen cars sold more than twice in a 6-9 month period and at least a dozen people here assoicated as "flippers." It stands to reason that enterprising people recognize the profit to be made and will go to great lengths to "rebuild" what in a normal market might be left alone.

I am not a collector, but an enthuiast. So for me as long as the car in question has the proper docs, numbers, and there isn't evidence of a rebody then it is good enough. Notice I didn't say I WANTED a rebody or that I would knowingly buy a rebody. However since any car I buy, I can't lay claim to having been there from its' inception to today (only a handful of original owners can do that) then I have to assume a car has had some type of work. If I'm coughing up the coinage for a "supercar" or some other rare car then I'm researching the docs and the cars' history BEFORE buying..not after. If I find the car was a race car and cut up and today it isn't..then I'm an idiot if I don't ASSUME extensive repair or a rebody, unless evidence to the contrary. I should then pay as such.

It is also funny to me when folks here talk about self policing the hobby and ensuring that "rebodies" are somehow catagorized. My opinion on the times I've seen susupected cars brought to light, it largely depends on 2 things..a) who is notifing the group and B) who owns the suspected car now. If it is someone out of the "loop" or group on either occasion the person and car are picked apart. If it is someone that everyone knows here and has coffee with at the car shows then it is kept pretty quiet and everyone hopes the discussion goes away. I would imagine largely because the whole "rebody" issue is a large negative in our hobby, and if "so and so" can be scrutinized then so can I mentality..

The bottom line is if an expert restoration is done on any given car..a "rebody" or installing a different body shell will not be detectable, It is only through thourgh research of a particular VIN that the truth might POSSIBILY be known. Sorry for being long winded..

Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

a supercar with extensive sheetmetal repair is alot different than a supercar firewall welded to a plain-jane body, and other assorted stuff transferred to the plain jane body to make it appear like the original supercar once did. They are not the same thing, and shouldn't be considered the same, and I don't care who owns it. I've seen some REALLY bad cars brought back to life without a rebody, so just because a car needs alot of work doesn't mean taking the easy way out and firewalling a car is "ok" because thats quick and easy, and fixing the existing car is alot of work.

Re: Rebodied cars and do they get certified
 

As an "enthusist" would you be pissed if you bought a car that didn't turn out to be what your homework told you it was ?