![]() |
Re: Is "stance" important?
I don't understand that. They're 95% identical to the old ones. To tell the truth, I can't even tell the difference.
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
I think the spokes are flatter ... right?
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: earntaz</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I think the spokes are flatter ... right? </div></div>
Yes and it is noticable, and it matters to some. |
Re: Is "stance" important?
It's a real turn off for me...same with implants.
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: JRC99</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't understand that. They're 95% identical to the old ones. To tell the truth, I can't even tell the difference. </div></div>
Not even close to the old ones. The new Cragars look like Cragar impostors back in the day. |
Re: Is "stance" important?
Older pic of mine, but I just love the "Stance" .....
BIG https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics...9593-image.jpg |
Re: Is "stance" important?
NIce Big. Concur - sweet stance, sweet shot!
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Sweet!!! [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/headbang.gif[/img]
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Great shot Steve! Man, that looks good!
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
That is a beautiful '68 Big.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.