![]() |
427 Chevelle Question
I'm in a disagreement with a buddie who says Chevrolet made a factory 427 Chevelle in 1966 and 1967, I don't think so, who is correct?
|
NO ONE has EVER come up with ANY proof that Chevrolet built a 66 or 67 427 Chevelle due to the 400 cubic inch rule though many have claimed it. On the other hand, MANY dealers did 427 Chevelle swaps in that era. I knew of a few myself. This has been a long standing argument on the Chevelle community for many years.
|
1966/1967 427 Chevelle . . . Urban Legend . . . along with 1965 327/375 HP F. I. Chevy II, Chevelle and El Camino
|
427's
1966 and 1967 General Motors production documents show no production of a 427 motor in either year.
Paul |
Looks like I won that bet, thanks guys!
|
Quote:
As if a production line cranking out millions of cars is going to stop and do special requests (not to mention the Engineering, supply chain logistics, etc involved with something as significant as a different engine). |
Quote:
|
I think what Paul is saying is during the 66/67 year there are no documents that have any 427 RPO codes assigned to a Chevelle of any kind. The Tonawanda plant never assigned a code for that engine (in a Chevelle) so therefore they could not have built and installed one.
|
Ah, thanks Rick. That is too bad, as one would think that the 427 and the Chevelle were made for one another.
|
----Late 65, Mark! And, to add to that, there were test 427 vehicles in 1965, mainly 1965 Corvettes, a few of which escaped the factory into private hands. One specific 65 was serial # 5 off the assembly line. It was initially built as a fuel injected roadster but taken to the tech center and had a 427 transplant. The car is fairly well known in Corvette circles. I have seen and inspected it closely.......Bill S
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If Don Yenko had harnessed the COPO process a little more aggressively in 1966, yeah, I believe he could have made 427 Chevelles happen. But he didn't. Which is a shame because it would have made for a fantastic car. |
Quote:
edit: I guess it really wasn't. Even still, the 69 COPOs Gibb ordered wasn't really a lot of cars it seems. Definitely not one offs though. "Instead of placing an order for Camaros using the “Regular Production Option” sheet, used by dealerships for performance and styling upgrades, a dealership began ordering Camaros using the Central Office Purchase Order (hence the name COPO), which was generally reserved for adding alterations to municipal fleets." https://www.gmpartscenter.net/blog/b...of-copo-camaro |
Quote:
|
I guess Chrysler was different from Chevrolet. They WOULD build anything, specifically Hemi cars. You just had to go to the right dealership (like Grand Spaulding Dodge) or know someone at Chrysler. You read their ordering forms that state that the Hemi was available in certain cars and not available in others. Yet there are Hemi 4 Doors (1966), Hemi Belvederes (1967), Hemi Coronet 440s (1968). They even proudly show a 1969 Hemi Charger which was not available (had to be an R/T) in one of their PR photos. ALL built by Chrysler - no dealer conversions.
|
Quote:
I've never seen any evidence of such a program in 66-67. It would have required substantial effort and cost, and they wouldn't have authorized it just because a person wanted to buy one that way. I would imagine you would have needed solid upper management connections and a 50 car minimum before they'd even consider it. It's also worth noting that lots of stuff appeared in PR photos that never made it to production. |
66 copo
I believe the 66 yenko stinger corvairs were copos because of the dual reservoir master cylinder. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
|
Thanks for all the replies, I did win the argument as he said 66 and 67 Chevelles had 427s which I said they didn't from the factory. 1969 would have been the only time that happened with very few built at the factory as a COPO Chevelle.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.