The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Supercar/Musclecar Discussion (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=79)
-   -   Is "stance" important? (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=121950)

ss427copo 03-25-2013 04:47 AM

Is "stance" important?
 
2 Attachment(s)
Sometimes the stance can make or break the look. I think it is integral for the correct muscle car era. Come on, show us yours!

VintageMusclecar 03-25-2013 12:45 PM

Re: Is "stance" important?
 
The only decent shot I've got right now--hope to change that soon though.

http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d73/VMCP777/1B.jpg

XXXGoldL34M20 03-25-2013 12:53 PM

Re: Is "stance" important?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Stance is important to get it right if you are going for the original height on a 1970 Chevelle SS. The back was always lower than the front [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]

9SECONDYENKO 03-25-2013 12:58 PM

Re: Is "stance" important?
 
https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use..._09_17_663.jpg
Here is mine 2 inch cal-trac rear leaf springs and moroso drag springs 2 coils cut out

XXXGoldL34M20 03-25-2013 12:59 PM

Re: Is "stance" important?
 
1 Attachment(s)
Lets not froget about my Mopar, The 1970 Challenger had one of the lowest stances in stock original form for a factory muscle car.

YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY 03-25-2013 01:20 PM

Re: Is "stance" important?
 
The stance is absolutely vital, whether it be the stock stance or the modified look - one inch in the wrong direction can make it or break it, IMHO.

Stock:

http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h6.../70Yenko17.jpg

Modified:

http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h6...rp/71Nova3.jpg

Salvatore 03-25-2013 01:25 PM

Re: Is "stance" important?
 
Nice one Jeff. camaros just got it licked in my opinion but I like them all!

Charley Lillard 03-25-2013 01:36 PM

Re: Is "stance" important?
 
https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...n_img_0865.jpg
https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...0-dsc_5941.jpg
https://www.yenko.net/attachments/use...ightfrtqrt.jpg

ZiggyL78 03-25-2013 02:08 PM

Re: Is "stance" important?
 
I don't see it as being lower Dan.The rocker looks horizontal to the ground.If you make a print of your pic and draw a line through the centres of the wheels and the bottom of the rocker,you will find the lines are parallel.I think if you measure the front of the rocker and compare it to the back,they will be very close.
I always remember back in 70 that when my LS6 was loaded for the track that the back went down.2 slicks on steel wheels with a tool box and a 24 of &quot;50&quot; was too much for stock springs.:)

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: XXXBlackLs6M22</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Stance is important to get it right if you are going for the original height on a 1970 Chevelle SS. The back was always lower than the front [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img] </div></div>

Mr70 03-25-2013 02:20 PM

Re: Is "stance" important?
 
2 Attachment(s)
Always been a fan of the factory stance.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.