![]() |
What do you think of this pad?
A friend of mine is interested in the following Corvette with this stamp pad. I have my own opinion but, I wanted to see what you guys thought before I taalked to him. Thanks in advance for your opinions, Ed
[image]http://i972.photobucket.com/albums/a...ROMSELLER6.jpg[/image] |
Re: What do you think of this pad?
|
Re: What do you think of this pad?
Broch marks look kind of heavy... https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/dunno.gif, compared to a some I have seen.
JMO Mike |
Re: What do you think of this pad?
stamped.
|
Re: What do you think of this pad?
Broaches and stampings aside, it looks as if much more was decked off it may expose the waterpump bolt hole?.
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/hmmm.gif ~ Pete |
Re: What do you think of this pad?
[ QUOTE ]
stamped. [/ QUOTE ] I agree |
Re: What do you think of this pad?
-----Am always suspect of stampings that are just too straight. As well, if you look at the broaching all the broach-marks are not parallel, and that just cant be.......Bill S
|
Re: What do you think of this pad?
Looks Bogus.......
Rich |
Re: What do you think of this pad?
The VIN is stramped into the block and the trans at the same time, so I checked some trans cases for the type of "3" that was used...
I found 2 Muncie main cases as examples... P9P13(sept 13th 1968) 19S703966 P9H06B(june 6th 1969) 19S731445 Both examples used round top 3"s not flat top 3"s... I have not seen a Corvette small VIN(1968 and later) use a flat top "3"... Hope this helps... Crash |
Re: What do you think of this pad?
If you zoom in a little on the vin stamp, I believe I can see the original stamping just above it. Decked and restamped with just the shadow of the original stamp barely visible.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.