![]() |
BBC parallel vs. series cooling
BBC parallel vs. series cooling
I am in the process of assembling a 427+.030. It will have 063 heads bolted to a 73’ 3999289 block. In the past I have used Fel-Pro 8180PT2 head gaskets on this engine with no issues. This rebuild will include new forged pistons with a skoshi more compression (no more than 10:1), solid lifter 143 cam (just because cuz’ I want the chatter -- LOL), etc. This will be a nostalgia street machine with the occasional playing at the strip. With that being said, there’s been much discussion on the net as to the pros/cons of parallel vs. series cooling as applied to the Mk-IV BBC. So I ask the experts here – should the deck be drilled or not? If the holes are drilled, what Fel-Pro gaskets should be used now? (Examples being 1017-1, 1037, etc.) Thanks – The TAZ |
Re: BBC parallel vs. series cooling
See this thread for pics & info.
My current 496 block is series cooled, but when the heads come off for the cylinder head swap and re-dyno, I plan to convert it to parallel cooling. |
Re: BBC parallel vs. series cooling
Thanks Eric -- I will be getting out the drill as well ... TAZ
|
Re: BBC parallel vs. series cooling
you would be fine you do not need to drill
|
Re: BBC parallel vs. series cooling
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BARRY</div><div class="ubbcode-body">you would be fine you do not need to drill</div></div>
The only Q I would have is why GM change the Mk-V and newer BBC from Series to Parallel cooling? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.