1966 Corvette posted on another Website
 

There is a 1966 Corvette posted on another website that is quite beautifully restored. The attached window sticker was posted with a claim to be the original window sticker for this vehicle. The Admins on this site do not allow anyone to refute supporting documents toward a car's authenticity, they consider this interfering with a sale and charge you with an infraction for doing so. I don't have any issue with reproduction documents as long as they are introduced as such.
Attached is a copy of the window sticker posted as original and the issues surrounding it: https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/pics...311_report.jpg

Re: 1966 Corvette posted on another Website
 

Paul, I noticed the same thing. Be care with that doc. Font is way off too...

Click here!

Re: 1966 Corvette posted on another Website
 

Yeppa, so many forums allow comments by members that are really looking out for the best interests of others and trying to protect them against fake documents purportedly advertised as originals, restamped motors, fake trim tags, POP's etc. However, on that website they punish you for interfering with a sale. Drives me crazy!!!!!!!

Paul

Re: 1966 Corvette posted on another Website
 

----To add to this, I'm pretty sure that you could not get an M20 with any 427/425 big block, no matter what rear was ordered!.......Bill S

----Sorry Paul, just noticed you mentioned that.

Re: 1966 Corvette posted on another Website
 

In law enforcement it's called aiding and abetting ... could be classified as a felony -- TAZ [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/headbang.gif[/img]