![]() |
Off topic engine question
I know the question is off topic so please accept my apologies. I promise I wont make a habit of this.
I was on a Jeep forum and a fellow was asking questions about building a Ford (waits a sec..looks up.....ok..no lightening ...keep typing) 302 to put into a Jeep. He was thinking about putting GT 40 heads on it. He was told the GT-40 heads were only good for hi end power and also the 302 in general isnt as good for low end torque as the Chevy (did i redeem myself mentioning Chevy?) 350. Wouldnt you be able to build any engine to be good in either the low end torque range or to be a high end, high horse power engine? Isnt the cam the true deciding factor and the valve train in general of low end or high end. I do understand the intake manifold also plays a part in range of power. What would make a design of a cylinder head specific to high end or low end power? One again sorry for the obsecure question but it is bugging me and I know that I will get a good answer here. |
Re: Off topic engine question
Head design is a pretty big factor in determining the power band. An example would be the different heads used on the big block Chevy. Big, square port heads are more for top end, where small, round port heads are for low end. I think it has to do with volume?
|
Re: Off topic engine question
Cyl head port volume and valve size will change your power curve. If you ever see BB Chevy truck heads - the valves look like nails compared to valves in the square port heads.
|
Re: Off topic engine question
Don't over look stoke. Longer stroke engines will make more low end torque when compared to a short stroke engine of equal displacement.
|
Re: Off topic engine question
JoeC,
Some have said the truck head valves look peanut sized compared to the HI-PO BB valves. |
Re: Off topic engine question
How about a Shelby American built FE. They run fine fuel injected. https://www.yenko.net/ubb/smilies/images/icons/smile.gif
|
Re: Off topic engine question
Top end, meaning high MPH is a result of horsepower, not torque. I believe you are looking for and engine with low end grunt. Specifically and injected one, so I am thinking you must have a rock-climber that will frequently slosh the fuel bowl of a carburetor.
A 350 TPI engine will give you a good amount of torque (due to its long intake runner), but those motors are so sexy and desirable that their cost can be the most unattractive part. I may be a little biased answering on this board, but I think it would be best to go with a big block for torque. If you have no religion in terms of mixing engine manufacturer with body type (and it sounds as if you don't) run an old Buick 455 or better yet a 472 or 500 Caddy! A simple TBI injection will allow you to use a stock donor mill. I hope someone here is willing to back me up. Can anyone else testify to these torque monster? |
Re: Off topic engine question
I'm the guy he is talking about that is planning a V8 swap for my Jeep. I was contemplating wheter I would swap in a Ford 302 out of a Stang or some kind of TPI 350. Whatever I swap in would need to be fuel injected. The fact that the 302 is more of a horsepower motor, rather than top end motor, I am considering a TPI 350. Is there a specific engine I should look for performance wise? Or is there any additional information
|
Re: Off topic engine question
Personally,I'm not a big fan of electronic fuel injections...for several reasons.
The biggest being,there expensive to work on,difficult to diagnose,and require a lot of expensive/specialised tools,if you plan to work on it your self. Plus,your more limited to what you can do,if you want to make some more horse power...unless price is no concern. Also,*in my opinion*...I don't think they offer all that much over a carburetored engine,in most cases...other than turbo applications. It's a pretty tuff question to answer,without knowing what the motor needs to do,what the budget is(if there is one),and what gears/trans/weight of vehicle is...ect. But,if the most bang for the bucks the plan,I would defiantly go with the 350 sb.There generally easy to find parts for,and prolly the most economical engine to play with.If fuel injection is an absolute must,a TBI might be an option too. |
Re: Off topic engine question
for street cars a carb would do a fine job, but street cars don't get on angles of 70*. When the Jeep hits the high inclines the floats in the carb don't supply fuel to the engine, leaving you stranded in a very dangerous spot, maybe even a rollover. If I swap in a V8, It must be fuel injected. I would like to swap in a big block, but it would be too much weight, and If I were to swap in something bigger than a SB 350, I would like to swap in a caddy 500, I've heard good things about those motors. Does anyone know how much a average TPI 350 makes power/torque wise?
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.