![]() |
COPO numbers
It appears that the COPO numbers got smaller as time went on. 9737 in 68; 9560,9561,9562 in 69; 9010 in 70. There must have been a system for assigning numbers. Can anyone tell us what that system was?
|
Re: COPO numbers
How's this. COPO#s started at 10,000 and were assigned down. The #s we don't see or care about are taxis, dump trucks, fleet cars etc. the yenko 68 COPO# vs the Gibb COPO# would be prime example. If you don't like this one i will think-up another one. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/scholar.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/naughty.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/CharleySucks.gif[/img]
|
Re: COPO numbers
Are you sure they weren't the square of the distance Don burned out in first gear?
|
Re: COPO numbers
I don't think that would be longgggggggggggggg enough? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/haha.gif[/img]
|
Re: COPO numbers
A few years ago I bought a GM COPO book. It listed all kinds of truck stuff and skipped right past the COPO stuff that we would be interested in. Thought that I had stumbled onto a real gold mine.....Not. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.