![]() |
Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
Over the years, there have been rumors that a few early 67 Z28 cars didn't have Muncie on the handle. As many of us know, a plain handle was intalled with a Saginaw transmission. I've been asked to restore a shifter from a late Dec. 1966 car that doesn't say Muncie. The shifter and linkage are indeed small block OEM Muncie.
Anyone ever seen a unmolested example of this? Thanks for knowlegable replys Gents. |
Re: Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
I did years ago about '84 had one out of 67 rs/ss 350 car..no idea of date didnt know how to read trim tags then..no one has beleived me there were plain handle shifters for muncies...Craig I think you even told me no way awhile back... https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif
is it stamped at the base???? |
Re: Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
1 Attachment(s)
I have one that has no stampings on it and the other one has a Big T stamped on it. Does anyone have an idea what its for.
suprss70 |
Re: Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
My understanding of that style shifter is:
Handle with MUNCIE: 67-8 Camaro with Muncie tranny Plain handle: 67 Firebird with Muncie or Saginaw; 67 Camaro with Saginaw Plain handle with T: 68 Camaro with Saginaw I have heard this from a few people over the years and I have parted a 68 Camaro with a Saginaw and it had a T; also parted a 67 Firebird 400 car with a muncie tranny and it had a plain handle. |
Re: Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
I've seen the large 'T' at the base of Muncie 4 and 3 speeds, Saginaw 4 and 3 speeds from 1967-69 handles. They are random and don't seem to relate to any particular year.
So my question remains: Anyone have a unmolested example of a early 67 plain handle factory installed on a Muncie Tranny? Early Z28 guys - please chime in. |
Re: Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
I dont consider my 67 z/28 an early car because it is a May car, but My shifter is what appears to be original and does not have the muncie on it. It is possible it was replaced, but the car has 19,000 miles and hasnt seen the road since about 1976. I'll try to take pics of it. It is still in the car.
|
Re: Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
Peter,
I don't know about the shifters, but I think you're due for a new toolbox. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/laugh.gif |
Re: Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
Joe
after 30 years in the trade I then retired at 55. and now the tools are used on restoring American Muscle, remember somethings are better with age. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...ns/naughty.gif https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...ins/3gears.gif Peter Suprss70 |
Re: Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
Drop an e-mail to Crash on this site...been to his place...the man is a transmission addict !!!He'll probably have a good idea.
|
Re: Shifter handles without the "Muncie" stamp?
[ QUOTE ]
I dont consider my 67 z/28 an early car because it is a May car, but My shifter is what appears to be original and does not have the muncie on it. It is possible it was replaced, but the car has 19,000 miles and hasnt seen the road since about 1976. I'll try to take pics of it. It is still in the car. [/ QUOTE ] Pictures would be very helpful Mike. Please post them if you can. Thanks for the effort - we all can learn something on this subject. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.