Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

I don't have a 427 Camaro/Chevelle but would a 1969 427/435HP L71 Corvette be considered a SUPERCAR? Is a 396/375HP L78 Camaro SS a SUPERCAR?

Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

I don't think it really matters. That is like asking if a car is a muscle car. If you like it, enjoy it. To answer the question, I think most here consider supercars to be dealer built or factory special built to qualify for racing.


Jason

Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

For this site..we define it simply

[ QUOTE ]
Dedicated to the promotion and preservation of the Chevrolet dealer
built Supercars and COPO cars.



[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

it is a very loaded question actually. as belair62 stated by the website description its dedicated to the CHEVROLET dealer built supercar and COPO cars. however, a 69 Hurst SC/rambler is a dealer built racecar specifically designed to compete in F Stock dragracing. and the SC in SC/rambler stands for Super Car. i am to young to know when exactly the term Super Car was placed on dealer installed and factory prepared automobiles, but i would be just plain lying to you if i said this was only a Chevy thing.

Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

I think that if you talk about the L89, L88 and ZL1 Corvettes, yes. I'd include the '71 LS6 in this group, also. You've got aluminum heads, solid lifter and tri-power in the case of the L89. These are racing cars with high dollar options that were in extremely low production when available. If you've ever driven a well tuned L89 Corvette, you'd classify it as a Supercar. I mean no disrespect for an L78, L72 or L71 Corvette, but these were certainly more mainstream Corvettes with a fair number made.

Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

[ QUOTE ]
it is a very loaded question actually. as belair62 stated by the website description its dedicated to the CHEVROLET dealer built supercar and COPO cars. however, a 69 Hurst SC/rambler is a dealer built racecar specifically designed to compete in F Stock dragracing. and the SC in SC/rambler stands for Super Car. i am to young to know when exactly the term Super Car was placed on dealer installed and factory prepared automobiles, but i would be just plain lying to you if i said this was only a Chevy thing.

[/ QUOTE ]

No one said Supercar were "only a Chevy thing". However this sites original intent was: Dedicated to the promotion and preservation of the Chevrolet dealer
built Supercars and COPO cars.

All featured Supercars are Chevrolets https://www.yenko.net/features/featurecars.htm

Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

The definition of a "Supercar". I see them as factory or dealer prepped high horsepower, low production muscle cars. Produced by many manufacturers. Not just Chevrolet.

That defintion differs from the Yenko/Copo Supercars focused on this site. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif

Patrick

Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

Like most things, why get caught up in rigid "rules". Although this site started as a chevrolet COPO and Dealer Site (at least when I started coming here) that was mostly camaro's and chevelles, it has become so much more. I remember when Deuce's became all the rage. Then came the discussions about the Deuce being a "supercar", but only a 350 car. That went on for a while. Finally, my 70 Z28 COPO was discussed. It is a COPO, but the COPO option was a spoiler package. How would that compare to a non "supercar" L78?

I say let's just enjoy em for what they are, and a 427 vette sure is a "super" car if it's not a "supercar".
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif

Rich

Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

Not so. The Deuce has been here since the beginning! The same discussions about the Deuce w/ it's Z28 drivetrain was just another rehash about the '69 Camaro with it's Impala L72 drivetrain.... If it's got a performance COPO #, or a dealer transplant/supertune - it's in! https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...iggthumpup.gif Heck, the stingers, vegas, & turbo Z's are 'SuperCars' https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif

Re: Would a 435HP vette be considered a SUPERCAR?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Not so. The Deuce has been here since the beginning! The same discussions about the Deuce w/ it's Z28 drivetrain was just another rehash about the '69 Camaro with it's Impala L72 drivetrain.... If it's got a performance COPO #, or a dealer transplant/supertune - it's in! https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...iggthumpup.gif Heck, the stingers, vegas, & turbo Z's are 'SuperCars' https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

How about big spoiler cars https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...mlins/haha.gif