The Supercar Registry

The Supercar Registry (https://www.yenko.net/forum/index.php)
-   Technical & Restoration (https://www.yenko.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=86)
-   -   3885069 versus 3933198 intake (https://www.yenko.net/forum/showthread.php?t=96172)

L88 12-31-2007 07:15 AM

3885069 versus 3933198 intake
 
Hi, I have a strange question. On L88 cars/motors, I know there are a few Intakes that Chevrolet used between the years. 3885069 (with a open plenum), 3886093, 3919851, and lastly the 3933198. I know you don't see a whole lot of any of these, but my question is, is one intake rarer than the other ?

JohnZ 01-02-2008 12:34 AM

Re: 3885069 versus 3933198 intake
 
[ QUOTE ]
Hi, I have a strange question. On L88 cars/motors, I know there are a few Intakes that Chevrolet used between the years. 3885069 (with a open plenum), 3886093, 3919851, and lastly the 3933198. I know you don't see a whole lot of any of these, but my question is, is one intake rarer than the other ?

[/ QUOTE ]

The 5069 and 6093 were probably the rarest in terms of actual use on production cars; both were used in 1967 on Corvettes, and only 20 units were built. The 6093 is listed as "possible". Hundreds of both were sold over-the-counter, however.

https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif

L88 01-02-2008 07:10 PM

Re: 3885069 versus 3933198 intake
 
Is there a certain date code range that a 5069 intake should have to be a original intake from a car, versus over the counter ? ?


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.


O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.