[motionwannabe]

i dont know. i would think barrett jackson would want to be known as a very thorough and meticulous company. i would think that they would want to be sure what they are selling as the "real deal" really is. I am not a fan of barrett jackson i was before all the shill bidding on the rebodied reggie jackson car. i mean fraud is fraud and in my eyes if they sell the car as 1969 #435 car well then they should be just as responsible for the crime. i know these cars still belong to the previous owners untill they are bought but just to be legit they should have them verified. i know if a buddy of mine was selling a bogus car and i were helping him unknowingly i would be upset when i found out and with my luck nobody would trust my judgement again. its simply my opinion. its like a guy saying hes elvis and i go along with his story and start charging people to see the real elvis only to find out the guys a lying sack of crap. im now an accessary to a crime. people lost money and when i look a judge in the face and say "well, i didnt know" hes gonna tell me maybe you should have checked into it before you charged people to see him. in my eyes b/j is just as guilty.