[njsteve]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
third time for this question.. This will be the deciding factor if it really was a judge or not..


[ QUOTE ]
and did it have the 'Judge' plate on the glovebox door?

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

1) Yes, it did. I thought that question was self answered b efore when I stated IT WAS A JUDGE.

2) If you have read all my posts in this thread you will understand that it was an original paint, unmolested, 5-6 year old car that I was the third owner of.

3) My car was DEFINATELY a Judge and had the multi colored stripes that surrounded the tops of the front fenders and rear quarters.




[/ QUOTE ]

You know, when people politely ask you a question several times in this thread, it is because they are trying to help you find an answer. You yourself said you're no expert in Pontiacs. Well guess what, there are a bunch of people here trying to help you, who are experts.

There were 17 1971 Judge ragtops known to have been produced through Pontiac's own records. And you, yourself said that it wasn't the blue one on the list. When you respond with a snide remark like the above examples it turns people off from assisting you at all.

SAYING THE CAR WAS A JUDGE DOESN'T ANSWER THE DIRECT QUESTION WHETHER IT HAD AN EMBLEM ON THE GLOVE BOX.

SAYING "IF YOU READ MY POSTS YOU'D KNOW IT WAS AN ORIGINAL PAINT CAR" DOES NOT ANSWER THE FACT THAT IT WAS A JUDGE IF YOU NEVER SAID IT WAS AN ORIGINAL PAINT CAR IN THE POSTS YOU REFER TO.

WHEN SEVERAL PEOPLE ASK YOU WHICH FRONT END STYLE IT HAD AND YOU NEVER GIVE AN ANSWER IT JUSTS LEADS PEOPLE TO BELIEVE YOU'RE JUST MAKING THIS ALL UP AS YOU GO ALONG.

I don't usually respond in this fashion to people on this site but if you can't be civil and polite and check the attitude at the door, then no-one is going to interact with you in a civil and polite fashion.