I'd like to know where the group at the "other" web site come down on this sort of collector car creativity? I notice that group is eager to be critical of anything/anyone sYc, but get amnesia when it comes to cars that are owned, restored or brokered via their own core group. This is one example of what I see as the real problem in this hobby. Some, on the other forum site, claim all the problem cars come from the sYc group, yet this Deuce was restored, certified and sold by one guy in the picture and is now owned by another guy in the same picture. 6-7 years ago, the same two guys had a hand in the red '69 Nova...one owned it and had it restored as a 427 Yenko Nova and the other guy certified it as a 427 Yenko conversion. The hobby seems to tolerate things like stripe color change, adding TT mag wheels, under dash gauges, circa incorrect tires, custom exhaust systems and headers, smog systems gone missing and other added do-dads that the factory/conversion shop order sheet didn't call out...so why is it so wrong for an owner to add/change the carburetor or slightly different paint color hue? It's a rhetorical question...we all know it's the hate-game that causes the personal bashing and gang attacks on anything sYc. Some claim the sYc is at the root of the problem and/or the only problem. With nearly 4,000 registered members and over 500 supporting members, I'd say the sYc is indeed the PREMIER supercar web site. Generally, the people that disagree have a personal bone to pick with one or more of the core group here. Unfortunately, the pictures below depict what I perceive to be the worst of the worst at deception with intent to defraud. Efforts to stop/expose this sort of foul play is time well spent, IMO, but you be the judge. We're accused of having a "flock" mentality here and being nothing more than Clary clan followers that are afraid/reluctant to speak up...how does that theory apply regarding this situation and the core group from the "other" forum site?
