View Single Post
  #2  
Old 09-26-2007, 01:18 AM
king_midas king_midas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: California
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: GM cubic inch limitations

I've heard it was because of a couple of reasons, some mechanical, and some reputational.

Mechanically, because of the use of the corp. 10-bolt axle as a perceived weak-link.

Reputationally, because performance was increasingly becoming an albatross around the neck, and the mfgr's knew the writing was on the wall regarding big engines, fuel, mpg, etc... In other words, there was no good reason to continue the engineering and federalizing of those engines into those cars, so they didn't do it.
Reply With Quote