View Single Post
  #4  
Old 09-26-2007, 02:36 AM
Late BrakeU2 Late BrakeU2 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Malibu CA.
Posts: 1,118
Thanks: 9
Thanked 103 Times in 53 Posts
Default Re: GM cubic inch limitations

I know prior to 1970 GM had a restriction stating no mid size car engine could have a displacement larger than 400 c.i.(hello COPO)but that was dropped the following year.A marketing standpoint and insurance are the only plausible reasons-Camaros and Novas were entry level where as the Impala,Chevelle,Monte,(Firebird,GTO,Buicks) targeted the "older" buying influence who were much less affected by insurance due to age.On a side note I think that's why so many more of the latter have more docs-the people that bought them were generally older and knew the importance of keeping records jmo
Reply With Quote