View Single Post
  #5  
Old 06-12-2018, 02:08 PM
cook_dw cook_dw is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,322
Thanks: 623
Thanked 1,490 Times in 610 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteLeathersac View Post
'


I don't believe Copo 9627 was a performance Copo # and more likely a fleet specific transmission and/or rear axle application?
Some listings note '67 Camaro Suffix FB w/ Copo 9627 which was a 250ci 6-Cyl. so again unlikely anything to do w/ performance?
Best always keep in mind Chevrolet's Copo system has been in place since 1958 or earlier and used multiple times more for fleet orders than performance applications...so, lots of parts to be found from Copo Taxis/Bell Telephone trucks etc.
Welcome aboard!

~ Pete




.


X2
Reply With Quote