View Single Post
  #8  
Old 01-08-2022, 09:19 PM
William William is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 197
Thanked 2,158 Times in 669 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70 copo View Post
Well we are getting someplace. You are now pivoting to a view that acknowledges what literally everybody in plant that remembers about the Firebird production integration.

Over several threads I have spent considerable time researching how the information processes that controlled plant production could fail (and why) and how those failures contributed to production data anomalies moving forward.

The data you and others collect and rely upon is generally only as good as the data produced by GM in that time period.


Just please do not run around claiming that Norwood stopped building Camaro's, that just did not happen-- until August 26th 1987 on the second shift and the last vehicle at the end of the line was a Camaro also.
I didn't say I was convinced it didn't happen. Known NCRS data has no Camaro production April 3-14. April 3 was a Thursday; they could easily have consumed the 353 unit gap by working all week, including Friday the 4th. The shipping data can't be that far off; Norwood had to queue finished cars away from the plant and space was tight. The cars were invoiced by GMAC the instant they left the plant. We have 200 dealer invoices for 1969 Camaros from one dealership. There is also a gap in shipping data:

N625818 shipped 4/3/69
N626468 shipped 4/14/69
N626665 shipped 4/15/69

The average build-to-ship queue 1/1/69 - 11/10/69 is 2.03 days. Not unusual to ship same day or next.

If you're dying to know, I have 15 complete VINs in the gap that are known to exist. Pick one in the middle and get NCRS for it.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote